DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea /Disasters & Emergencies

Seoul overpass collapse: Safety inspection proceeded despite 'subsidence risk'

From Hankyoreh · () Korean

Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Under investigation
  • The collapse of the Seosomun overpass in Seoul occurred despite prior detection of structural defects and ongoing safety inspections.
  • Experts question whether proper demolition procedures were followed and if safety protocols were adequate given the detected subsidence.
  • The incident highlights concerns about the safety of demolition work in critical urban areas and the potential for rushed procedures.

Questions are emerging about the safety procedures followed during the demolition of Seoul's Seosomun overpass, which collapsed on May 26, 2026, resulting in three fatalities and three injuries. The overpass, built in 1966 and rated a 'D grade' in structural integrity, was undergoing demolition when a section unexpectedly crumbled.

Evidence suggests that warning signs were present before the fatal collapse. Earlier on the day of the incident, during slab cutting operations, a subsidence of approximately 2.9 centimeters was detected, leading to a work stoppage. Despite this indication of structural instability, a safety inspection involving experts proceeded shortly after, ultimately leading to the collapse.

The dismantling should proceed in reverse order of construction, first removing slabs and then supports. During this process, there is a dangerous moment when the support alone must bear the load. Precautionary measures must be taken before cutting work, and we need to confirm if this sequence was followed.

โ€” Lee Seok-jongVice Chairman of the Korea Council of Structural Engineers, Lee Seok-jong, commented on the potential procedural issues during demolition.

Experts are scrutinizing the demolition process, emphasizing the importance of following established procedures, such as dismantling from the top down and ensuring adequate support during critical phases. There is concern that the sequence of operations may not have been strictly adhered to, potentially creating dangerous stress on the remaining structure. The fact that the inspection team entered a confined space beneath the slab, which was then supported only by a girder, is particularly being questioned.

We need to investigate whether the pre-collapse subsidence measurement was done properly and if the work was carried out according to the safety management plan.

โ€” Choi Myung-kiProfessor Choi Myung-ki of the Korea Industrial Safety and Health Agency emphasized the need to investigate the adherence to safety protocols.

Furthermore, the decision to proceed with the safety inspection despite the earlier detected subsidence is raising concerns about risk assessment and protocol adherence. Experts suggest that a more thorough preliminary risk evaluation might have been necessary before allowing personnel into a compromised area. The incident occurred over a vital urban corridor, with roads and KTX train lines running beneath the overpass, narrowly avoiding a larger catastrophe.

Investigations have been launched by multiple agencies, including the Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Ministry of Employment and Labor, and the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, to determine the exact cause of the collapse and assign responsibility. The focus is on uncovering whether procedural shortcuts were taken and if safety management plans were adequately implemented.

Even to the naked eye, the supports looked weak, yet the experts entered. We need to clarify whether risk assessment or preliminary visual inspection procedures were omitted before entering the site.

โ€” Chae JinProfessor Chae Jin of Mokwon University's Fire and Safety Department questioned the decision to allow experts into the compromised area.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.