DistantNews
Support us
Serbia's budget revision sparks debate: Growth stimulus or election campaign funding?
๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ธ Serbia /Elections & Politics

Serbia's budget revision sparks debate: Growth stimulus or election campaign funding?

From N1 Serbia · () Serbian

Translated from Serbian and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

News Sources not specified Context piece
  • Serbia's revised budget has prompted debate on whether increased spending aims to boost economic growth or serve as pre-election campaign funding.
  • Economist Ivan Nikoliฤ‡ argues that better-than-expected revenue allows for increased spending to support domestic demand and maintain growth above three percent.
  • Opposition politician Duลกan Nikeziฤ‡ criticizes the budget as a "classic pre-election populist budget," designed to buy votes and fund President Vuฤiฤ‡'s campaign with an additional billion euros.

Serbia's latest budget revision has reopened a critical debate: will the government's increased spending stimulate economic growth, or is it a thinly veiled attempt to fund an upcoming election campaign?

Economist Ivan Nikoliฤ‡, who also chairs the National Bank's Governor's Council, views the revision more favorably. He contends that higher-than-planned revenue collection has created fiscal space for increased expenditures. Nikoliฤ‡ believes these outlays, directed towards social benefits and investments, will bolster domestic demand. "The motive for this rebalance was revenue collection," Nikoliฤ‡ stated, noting that revenue grew by 8.6% in real terms by June, with inflation also lower than anticipated. This surplus, he explained, can support demand and help maintain economic growth potentially above three percent, especially as external demand and the Eurozone's condition limit growth, alongside chronic domestic industrial constraints related to energy.

However, Duลกan Nikeziฤ‡, an economist and member of the opposition Party of Freedom and Justice (SSP), strongly disagrees. He labels the budget a "classic pre-election populist budget," asserting that all spending increases are timed to coincide with the expected October elections, aiming to buy votes. "This is a pre-election budget also in the sense that it allows Vuฤiฤ‡ to get another billion euros for the campaign and the attempt to buy votes," Nikeziฤ‡ claimed.

Nikeziฤ‡ points to specific budget items as evidence, such as doubling allocations for "Putevi Srbije" (Serbian Roads) to over 200 million euros, which he says will fund promises of road construction during the campaign. He also cites increased benefits for pensioners and social welfare recipients as vote-buying tactics. "These are all benefits aimed at buying votes," he asserted.

Furthermore, Nikeziฤ‡ disputes Nikoliฤ‡'s assessment of fiscal surplus. "I would not agree that we have a surplus when we have a deficit," he countered, highlighting a budget deficit exceeding three billion euros, the second-largest in Serbian history after 2020. He stated this deficit will be financed through new borrowing, pushing the national debt to 42 billion euros. Nikoliฤ‡, in contrast, defended the deficit, noting it was 1.1% of GDP in the first half of the year, which he described as the best result in Europe at the time, far lower than the five percent deficits seen in many other European countries.

About this summary

Originally published by N1 Serbia in Serbian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.