DistantNews
Support us
Serbian Media's Delayed, Distorted Coverage of Operation Storm's 'Fall of Knin'
๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Croatia /Conflict & Security

Serbian Media's Delayed, Distorted Coverage of Operation Storm's 'Fall of Knin'

From Veฤernji List · () Croatian

Translated from Croatian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

Analysis Named sources Context piece
  • Serbian media and officials largely ignored the "fall of Knin" during Operation Storm in 1995, with some outlets delaying the news significantly.
  • Official Serbian narratives frame Operation Storm as the largest expulsion of Serbs since WWII, often linking it to WWII-era atrocities.
  • Contemporary Serbian media, including state-controlled outlets, continue to use Operation Storm to promote nationalist narratives and criticize Croatia.

Serbian official policy, nationalist opposition, and regime-controlled media largely began their narrative of the war in Croatia on August 4, 1995, with Operation Storm, ignoring preceding events. This framing omits the "balvan revolution" in 1990, the open aggression a year later, the occupation of Croatian territory, and the expulsion of non-Serb populations, as well as numerous atrocities like the fall of Vukovar.

Mainstream media under government control exclusively follow the official narrative of Operation Storm as "the largest expulsion of civilians in Europe since World War II." President Aleksandar Vuฤiฤ‡ annually reiterates threats that "Serbia will not allow new Storms." Officials connect the operation to alleged "culmination of a multi-decade process of extermination of Serbs in Croatia," drawing parallels to atrocities committed by the Ustaลกe regime during World War II.

Serbia will not allow new Storms.

โ€” Aleksandar Vuฤiฤ‡The current Serbian president's annual statement on the anniversary of Operation Storm, reflecting the ongoing official narrative.

However, a closer look at the 1995 reporting reveals a different picture. Radio Television of Serbia, a key propaganda tool for Slobodan Miloลกeviฤ‡, and other outlets like Veฤernje novosti and Politika, only reported the "fall of Knin" 20 minutes into their news programs, while Tanjug did not mention it at all. On August 5, 1995, Veฤernje novosti ran the headline "Attack by 100,000 Soldiers," and Politika reported "More than 2,000 shells fell on Knin." Initial reports assessed the defense of the Republic of Serbian Krajina as stable.

President Franjo Tuฤ‘man's call for Croatian Serbs to remain in their homes was dismissed by Belgrade media as a mix of insult and cynicism. In the initial days, Belgrade media focused on the surprising collapse of the Republic of Serbian Krajina. Later, emphasis shifted to the columns of Serb refugees stopped near Belgrade and alleged crimes by Croatian forces. War instigator Vojislav ล eลกelj and RSK President Milan Martiฤ‡, both convicted war criminals, made statements reflecting the chaos and blaming others.

We warned that Serbia is defended in Knin and that Kosovo is defended in Knin, but nobody listened.

โ€” Vojislav ล eลกeljA statement made by the convicted war criminal Vojislav ล eลกelj, reflecting a nationalist perspective on the importance of defending Serbian positions.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Veฤernji List in Croatian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.