DistantNews
Support us
‘Show us the drug dens’: South Africa rejects Nigeria’s compensation demand

‘Show us the drug dens’: South Africa rejects Nigeria’s compensation demand

From Vanguard · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • South Africa's government rejected Nigeria's demand for compensation for properties abandoned by Nigerians during xenophobic attacks.
  • Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni stated that only legally registered assets would be recognized and controversially asked Nigeria to identify alleged "drug dens" linked to its citizens.
  • Ntshavheni clarified that informal settlements are not considered properties as they are illegal, and thus ineligible for compensation.

South Africa's government has pushed back against Nigeria's intention to seek compensation for properties left behind by Nigerians fleeing recent xenophobic violence. The South African government insists that only legally registered assets will be considered and has controversially called on Nigeria to identify alleged "drug dens" associated with its citizens.

If you own a property in South Africa, it’s registered. If it’s a house, it’s registered with the Deeds Register. If you own a car, it’s registered in the NATIS system. If you own a business, it’s registered with the CIPC.

— Khumbudzo NtshavheniExplaining the documentation requirements for legally owned assets in South Africa.

Khumbudzo Ntshavheni, South Africa's Minister in the Presidency, outlined the government's position during a press briefing. She explained that legally acquired properties in South Africa are officially documented and remain under the ownership of their registered owners, who are free to sell them. "If you own a property in South Africa, it’s registered. If it’s a house, it’s registered with the Deeds Register. If you own a car, it’s registered in the NATIS system. If you own a business, it’s registered with the CIPC," she stated.

Ntshavheni maintained that Nigerians with legally owned property could sell these assets rather than expect government compensation. However, she then raised controversy by expressing interest in identifying locations allegedly used for drug-related activities by Nigerians. "We’ll be interested to know where the drug dens of Nigerians are so they can show us where they’ve been holding the drugs so that we can clean the drugs in South Africa quite urgently," Ntshavheni said.

We’ll be interested to know where the drug dens of Nigerians are so they can show us where they’ve been holding the drugs so that we can clean the drugs in South Africa quite urgently.

— Khumbudzo NtshavheniExpressing the government's interest in identifying alleged drug dens linked to Nigerian citizens.

Furthermore, Ntshavheni ruled out any compensation for structures in informal settlements, deeming them illegal under South African law. "Informal squatter camps and settlements are never properties because they are illegal in the country. So you are already violating our law if you tell us about a shack in an informal settlement. So there is no compensation that will come from government," she declared. This stance follows Nigeria's announcement of plans to seek compensation for citizens who lost businesses and property during the anti-migrant violence.

Informal squatter camps and settlements are never properties because they are illegal in the country. So you are already violating our law if you tell us about a shack in an informal settlement. So there is no compensation that will come from government.

— Khumbudzo NtshavheniStating that structures in informal settlements are not eligible for compensation due to their illegal status.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Vanguard. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.