DistantNews
Support us
Solicitors who resigned over legal aid row should rethink, says Taoiseach

Solicitors who resigned over legal aid row should rethink, says Taoiseach

From RTÉ News · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • Taoiseach Micheál Martin urged solicitors who resigned from the Criminal Legal Aid panel to reconsider their decision and return to representing clients.
  • Solicitors have withdrawn services due to a new flat-fee payment scheme, which replaced a per-appearance payment system, leading to thousands of case adjournments.
  • The Minister for Justice stated he will not revoke the new legal aid fees system despite the disruption, though he is open to making minor adjustments.

Taoiseach Micheál Martin has called on solicitors who resigned from the Criminal Legal Aid panel to "rethink and reflect" on their decision, urging them to resume representing people in court. The resignations stem from an escalating dispute over fees following the implementation of a new legal aid payments scheme a fortnight ago.

I am concerned as I think people should not be withdrawing their services. I would ask those who are to rethink and reflect and to do in my view what there is an obligation to do, and that's represent people in court.

— Micheál MartinThe Taoiseach urged solicitors to reconsider their resignation from the Criminal Legal Aid panel.

The new system introduces a flat fee of €520 per client, replacing the previous model where solicitors were paid for each court appearance. Under the old system, the first appearance for a single person yielded €239.38, with subsequent hearings earning €59.86. Solicitors at the Criminal Courts of Justice have ceased providing criminal defense services and are refusing to advise suspects detained in garda stations, citing the inadequacy of the new fee structure.

The system did need reform. Without question it needed reform. There has been engagement - the minister and the department have engaged with the Law Society.

— Micheál MartinThe Taoiseach acknowledged the need for reform in the legal aid system.

Sinn Féin's Justice Spokesperson, Matt Carthy, highlighted the severe consequences of the solicitors' withdrawal, noting that thousands of criminal cases have been adjourned. He reported that victims are attending court only to be turned away, and individuals who should be in custody are being released on bail, increasing pressure on the prison service. Carthy urged the government to resolve the "chaos in the courts" before the summer recess.

More importantly, we've now seen thousands of criminal cases adjourned. We've seen victims turning up to court and being turned away, waiting for justice. We've also seen people who should be in custody today being released on bail and at times we've seen remand numbers increase put pressure on our already stretched prison service.

— Matt CarthySinn Féin's Justice Spokesperson described the impact of the solicitors' resignations on the court system.

Despite the widespread disruption, the Minister for Justice, Jim O'Callaghan, has maintained a firm stance, stating he will not revoke the new legal aid fees system or yield to political pressure. He acknowledged that the system needed reform due to multiple adjournments and an outdated fee structure, and that engagement with the Law Society has occurred. However, O'Callaghan warned that solicitors attempting to disrupt cases to force a regulatory change would be unsuccessful, though he reserved the right to make "tweaks" to the system.

Some solicitors think that if they put enough pressure on the system to disrupt cases, that this is going to result in political pressure on me, and I'm going to revoke the regulations. That's not going to happen.

— Jim O'CallaghanThe Minister for Justice stated his refusal to revoke the new legal aid fees system.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by RTÉ News in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.