South Korea Considers Expanding Modern History in Middle Schools Amidst Educator Concerns

South Korea's National Education Committee is deliberating a significant revision to the middle school history curriculum, aiming to expand the coverage of modern and contemporary history. The Ministry of Education has proposed increasing the segment dedicated to this period from the current 20% to over 30%, framing it as a key initiative to bolster democratic citizen education.

The Ministry justifies the proposed change by highlighting the current imbalance, where middle school history dedicates 80% to pre-modern history and only 20% to modern and contemporary history. This contrasts sharply with high school curricula, which allocate 65% to modern and contemporary history. Officials argue that teaching modern history primarily in the second semester of the third year of middle school limits effective instruction.

“

The curriculum revision is against the principle of revising after receiving feedback from the field. Changing the 2022 revised curriculum, which has not even been applied to third-year middle school students yet, undermines the consistency and predictability of the curriculum.

However, the proposal faces opposition from educators who believe it undermines the consistency and predictability of the curriculum. Critics point out that the 2022 revised curriculum, which is still being implemented, already established a certain structure. They suggest that if an increase in modern history education is desired, it should be addressed by revising the high school curriculum, where the proportion was recently reduced.

Further concerns raised by teachers include the potential disruption to the chronological flow between middle and high school history education. Some educators also advocate for fostering a classroom environment conducive to free discussion, free from political constraints, rather than solely focusing on expanding curriculum hours. The National Education Committee has deferred a decision on the matter, indicating a need for further discussion.

“

Strengthening history education does not necessarily have to lead to an expansion of class hours or the creation of new subjects. What is needed now is to create a classroom where teachers can engage in free discussion, free from the constraints of political neutrality.