South Korean Lawmakers Propose Constitutional Amendment to Curb 'Imperial' Presidential Power

The current push for a constitutional amendment in South Korea, spearheaded by 187 lawmakers from across the political spectrum, represents a critical juncture in the nation's democratic journey. As detailed by the Hankyoreh, this initiative, while "minimalist" in scope, seeks to address fundamental issues that have plagued the country's political landscape, particularly the potential for authoritarian overreach.

“

The core of this amendment bill is clear. It is to prevent the recurrence of unconstitutional events like the December 3rd emergency decree by explicitly stating the National Assembly's right to approve and dissolve emergency measures.

The core of the proposed amendment lies in preventing a repeat of historical abuses of power, such as the "December 3rd emergency decree." By seeking to explicitly grant the National Assembly the power to approve and dissolve emergency measures, the amendment aims to rebalance power and ensure legislative oversight. Furthermore, the inclusion of pivotal democratic movements like the April 19th Revolution, the Gwangju Uprising (May 18th), and the Busan-Masan Uprising in the constitution's preamble serves as a powerful recognition of the people's role in safeguarding democracy.

“

The proposal also includes adding historical events where citizens took to the streets as protectors of democracy, such as the April 19th Democratic Revolution, the Gwangju Democratization Movement, and the Busan-Masan Resistance, to the preamble of the Constitution.

However, the path to constitutional reform is fraught with challenges. Despite the broad support among lawmakers, the amendment has yet to become a central political agenda item, largely due to the calculations surrounding the upcoming elections. This political inertia underscores a recurring theme in South Korea's history: constitutional change often requires a groundswell of public demand that transcends partisan divides. The failure of numerous amendment attempts over the past four decades serves as a stark reminder of this reality.

“

This amendment bill aims for 'minimalism'. Although it seems like it could pass easily because there are no dissenting opinions or opposition, the reality is not that simple.

From our perspective at the Hankyoreh, the "minimalist" approach is pragmatic, focusing on widely agreed-upon reforms. Yet, the resistance it faces highlights a deeper issue: the lingering "monarchical" tendencies within the South Korean political system. The article's critique of the "imperial" aspects of the presidency, stemming from the Yushin Constitution era, remains relevant. While the 1987 democratization significantly reformed the constitution, vestiges of presidential power and the temptation to wield it "monarchically" persist. This amendment is a crucial step, but the ultimate success of true democratic reform hinges on sustained public engagement and a collective will to exorcise these "imperial toxins" from our foundational law.

“

Looking at the various attempts at constitutional amendment that have failed over the past 40 years, we are reminded anew that constitutional amendment is only possible when the fervent desire of the people, transcending party lines, overwhelms the political sphere.