Supreme Court rejects appeal over Likud regional slots, backs party court ruling

Israel's Supreme Court has rejected an appeal that challenged a Likud party court's decision concerning regional slots on the party's Knesset slate. The appeal was filed by MK Afif Abed after the Likud court overturned a previous vote that would have allowed serving members of Knesset, ministers, and deputy ministers to compete for these regional positions.

“

The District Court decided not to intervene in the Likud court's decision, why should we intervene where the District Court found no problem?

Justices Daphne Barak Erez, Ofer Grosskopf, and Alex Stein heard the petition but ultimately dismissed it, particularly after Abed withdrew his appeal following indications from the panel that they intended to reject it. During the hearing, the justices expressed criticism regarding the decision to bring an internal party dispute before the High Court of Justice. Justice Barak Erez questioned the necessity of Supreme Court involvement, suggesting the matter could be resolved internally.

“

Why is the Supreme Court needed?

Justice Grosskopf echoed this sentiment, stating there were no grounds for judicial intervention, as the District Court had already found no issue with the Likud court's decision. He emphasized that the Likud movement's court is the designated body for such decisions and should be respected. "The Likud movement's court is the body that is supposed to make decisions on these matters, and we must respect it," Grosskopf stated. "It reached a conclusion and explained its reasoning, and there is no reason for us to intervene."

“

We will not complain if you resolve it among yourselves. I ask that you try to reach agreements.

Attorney Guy Bussi, representing Abed, argued that the District Court had found the Likud court exceeded its authority. However, Justice Barak Erez disputed this interpretation, clarifying that the District Court had identified a flaw in only one of three grounds. She concluded that the party court's ruling, which determined that MKs do not compete in districts and that a decision to change this was flawed, should stand.

“

The Likud movement's court is the body that is supposed to make decisions on these matters, and we must respect it. It reached a conclusion and explained its reasoning, and there is no reason for us to intervene. That is what a court is for.