DistantNews
Support us

Supreme Court rift deepens as officials snub acting Chief Justice Malla’s order

From Kathmandu Post · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • Nepal's Supreme Court is experiencing internal conflict as officials defied acting Chief Justice Sapana Pradhan Malla's order to register a writ petition challenging a judicial appointment.
  • The dispute stems from the Constitutional Council's recommendation of Justice Manoj Kumar Sharma, who is not the most senior judge, for the chief justice position, breaking established practice.
  • The court administration's refusal to register the petition, despite Malla's directive and regulations allowing direct appeals to the bench, has deepened the rift and raised questions about judicial independence.

A significant crisis is unfolding within Nepal's highest judicial body, the Supreme Court, as highlighted by recent events reported by the Kathmandu Post. The court administration's refusal to comply with acting Chief Justice Sapana Pradhan Malla's order to register a writ petition challenging the recommendation of Justice Manoj Kumar Sharma for the chief justice position has exposed a deep rift. This defiance is particularly concerning as it bypasses established procedures and undermines the authority of the acting chief justice.

The crux of the matter lies in the Constitutional Council's decision to recommend Justice Sharma, who is fourth in seniority, for the top judicial post. This move deviates from the long-standing tradition of appointing the senior-most judge, raising questions about the integrity of the selection process. The subsequent refusal by the court administration to even register a petition challenging this recommendation, despite clear directives from the acting chief justice and provisions within the Supreme Court Regulations, suggests a deliberate obstruction.

Any person dissatisfied with an order of the chief registrar or registrar may file an application before the bench within seven days.

— Rule 10 of the Supreme Court Regulations, 2017This regulation allows petitioners to directly approach a bench if the court administration refuses to register a case, a provision invoked by those seeking to challenge the chief justice recommendation.

This internal discord is not merely a procedural dispute; it strikes at the heart of judicial independence and public trust in our legal system. The fact that the administration reportedly acted on instructions from the very judge recommended for chief justice, as stated by the acting chief justice, is deeply troubling. Such actions create an environment where impartiality is questioned and the rule of law appears vulnerable. The Kathmandu Post emphasizes that maintaining the dignity and impartiality of the judiciary requires adherence to established norms and transparent processes, which seem to be under severe strain.

the chief registrar had informed judges that the petition had not been registered following instructions from Sharma, the judge recommended for chief justice.

— Sapana Pradhan MallaActing Chief Justice Malla stated this in her written order, indicating that the recommended chief justice influenced the administration's decision not to register the petition.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Kathmandu Post. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.