DistantNews
Support us
Supreme Court rules: Workplace insults and abuse cost chef severance pay
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Turkey /Crime & Justice

Supreme Court rules: Workplace insults and abuse cost chef severance pay

From Cumhuriyet · () Turkish

Translated from Turkish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Outcome reported
  • Turkey's Supreme Court ruled that a head chef fired for insulting a trainee and disrupting the workplace is not entitled to severance pay.
  • The court found that the chef's actions, including verbal abuse and aggressive behavior, justified the employer's decision to terminate his contract for cause.
  • This ruling sets a precedent for employers to dismiss staff without severance for severe workplace misconduct that damages trust.

Turkey's Supreme Court has issued a landmark ruling, denying severance pay to a head chef dismissed for verbally abusing a trainee and creating a hostile work environment. The court upheld the employer's decision to terminate the chef's contract for just cause, establishing a significant precedent.

The case involved a head chef, identified as K.H., who sued his employer for unfair dismissal, seeking severance and other payments. However, the employer argued that K.H. frequently swore at and insulted the trainee chef, M.K., and other staff, thereby disrupting workplace harmony. The employer contended that this behavior constituted just cause for termination.

The initial court sided with the employee, finding insufficient evidence from the employer. However, the Supreme Court's 9th Civil Chamber took a different view. It emphasized that an employee's harassment, swearing, disruption of work peace, and breach of loyalty obligations provide valid grounds for an employer to dismiss an employee without severance.

An employee's harassment, swearing, disruption of work peace, and breach of loyalty obligations provide valid grounds for an employer to dismiss an employee without severance.

โ€” Supreme Court of TurkeyThe court's reasoning for upholding the employer's decision to terminate the head chef's contract.

The Supreme Court's decision detailed that evidence confirmed K.H. had yelled at the trainee chef M.K. over the smell of cleaning cloths, using severe profanity and threats. Despite the trainee having a doctor's note following eye surgery, K.H. allegedly insulted him publicly, calling him an "ox," "idiot," "stupid," and "useless."

The court further noted that K.H. exhibited aggressive behavior towards other staff, disrupting the work order with his profanity. This conduct, the court concluded, destroyed the trust relationship between the employer and employee, justifying the termination under Article 25 of the Labor Law. Consequently, the chef is not entitled to severance or notice pay.

ox, idiot, stupid, useless, do whatever you want

โ€” Head Chef (K.H.)Insults allegedly directed at a trainee chef, as cited in the Supreme Court ruling.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Cumhuriyet in Turkish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.