Swiss Intelligence Must Disclose Some Facial Recognition Documents
Translated from German, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
TLDR
- A Swiss court partially ruled in favor of a digital rights group seeking documents on the use of facial recognition software by the Federal Intelligence Service.
- The court stated that the intelligence service must disclose some information, but crucial details will remain classified.
- The ruling hinges on the interpretation of
The Federal Intelligence Service (NDB) has been ordered by the Federal Administrative Court to disclose documents concerning its use of facial recognition software. This decision comes after the digital rights group 'Digitale Gesellschaft' filed a request under the Public Information Act. While the court partially sided with the group, granting access to some information, it has upheld the intelligence service's right to withhold critical details.
The core of the dispute lies in the interpretation of 'information procurement' under the Intelligence Service Act. The NDB argued that the software's functions, which include searching existing data and enabling new insights, fall under this exemption, thus shielding the documents from public disclosure. They contended that separating data procurement from data processing is impossible and that releasing the documents would jeopardize national security.
However, the court broadened the definition of 'information procurement' to encompass all data processing activities by the NDB, regardless of their legality. This nuanced ruling means that while some operational and technical details might become public, the NDB can still classify information deemed vital to national security. This case highlights the ongoing tension between transparency and national security in Switzerland, particularly regarding advanced surveillance technologies.
Er schliesst zusรคtzlich zur Beschaffung von Daten auch die gesamte weitere Datenbearbeitung durch den NDB mit ein
Originally published by Neue Zรผrcher Zeitung in German. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.