Taiwan: Education bureau clarifies student ID system after transgender privacy announcement sparks backlash

Tainan City's education bureau has clarified its current student ID system following a controversial announcement that aimed to protect transgender students' privacy. The bureau had initially stated that starting from the 115th academic year, student ID numbers and seat assignments would be generated based on birthdates or the number of name strokes, effectively removing gender information.

This directive, intended to safeguard the privacy and rights of transgender students, sparked immediate backlash from some teachers who criticized it as unnecessary. The bureau subsequently halted the implementation of the new coding system.

“

The current student ID number uses a 7-digit code, with the first 3 digits for the academic year and the last 4 for a serial number. It does not distinguish by gender, so there is no situation where gender is identified through the student ID number.

City councilor Huang Chao-hui had raised concerns about whether student ID numbers still contained gender distinctions and how future systems would balance gender equality with school management needs. He pointed out that gender distinctions remain necessary in certain contexts, such as swimming classes and health examinations, for safety and privacy reasons.

Education Bureau Director Cheng Hsin-hui explained that the current seven-digit student ID system consists of the academic year followed by a serial number and does not encode gender. He confirmed that the previous announcement was withdrawn for further review and that schools continue to assign student IDs according to existing regulations. Any future standardized system will be formally announced after completing legal administrative procedures and thorough communication with schools. The bureau also highlighted its support platforms for students with special needs and its efforts to promote inclusive education.

“

Swimming classes, health check-ups, and other situations involving physical safety and privacy still require gender distinctions. Not all situations are suitable for removing gender classification.