Tanzania's opposition criticises 'whitewashing' of violence

The Tanzanian government's release of a report into the deadly violence that followed the October 2025 elections marks a significant, albeit contentious, step towards addressing a painful chapter in the nation's history. While President Samia Suluhu Hassan welcomed the probe as a means to "close a painful chapter" and guide future reforms, the report's findings have been met with sharp criticism from opposition parties and human rights groups. These entities accuse the government of attempting to "whitewash" the events and minimize the extent of state-sanctioned violence.

“

the figure of 518 might not be final and conclusive.

The commission, led by retired Chief Justice Mohamed Chande Othman, collected extensive evidence but has presented a death toll of 518, a figure Othman himself admits may not be final. The commission's assertion that the violence was planned and funded by "trained people" lacks specific attribution, leaving a crucial element of accountability unaddressed. Furthermore, the rejection of independent reports concerning mass graves and the seizure of bodies from hospital mortuaries by the commission raises serious questions about its thoroughness and impartiality.

“

indisputable evidence the violence was planned and funded by “trained people,” but did not name them.

From the perspective of Tanzania's opposition, the government's narrative clashes starkly with eyewitness accounts and the findings of international organizations like Amnesty International and the United Nations. These sources have consistently reported hundreds, if not thousands, of deaths, mass arrests, and allegations of enforced disappearances, with security forces accused of using lethal force against peaceful protesters. The government's imposition of an internet shutdown during the unrest further fuels suspicions of a deliberate attempt to control information and suppress dissent. The dispute over casualty figures and the handling of evidence underscores a deep divide in how the post-election violence is perceived and remembered within Tanzania, highlighting the ongoing struggle for truth and reconciliation.

“

could not be substantiated.