DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland /Culture & Society

Task switching is cognitive self-sabotage, expert says: Exhausted like after a marathon, with results like walking in place

From Rzeczpospolita · () Polish

Translated from Polish and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

Interview Named sources Context piece
  • Frequently shifting between tasks can reduce productivity, disrupt concentration and increase the risk of errors, according to Prof. Anna Baczyล„ska of Kozminski University in Warsaw.
  • Research cited by the American Psychological Association indicates that task switching costs time and smooth performance, even when workers feel busy and fast.
  • The lingering attention from an unfinished task can leave employees tired while important work remains incomplete.

A person can spend the whole day answering emails, taking calls, checking Teams, correcting spreadsheets and commenting on a presentation, yet still feel that the most important task has barely moved. That is the paradox of task switching, according to Prof. Anna Baczyล„ska of the Department of Human Resource Management at Kozminski University in Warsaw.

Baczyล„ska compares constant task changes to being told every five minutes to leave one train and board another, followed by surprise that the passenger has not arrived on time. In her view, moving repeatedly between responsibilities does not demonstrate modern efficiency. It creates a costly cognitive burden.

The issue appears in the television series โ€œThe Game Changer,โ€ whose central character, Isla Gordon, unexpectedly becomes president of the Los Angeles Waves basketball club. Gordon must make strategic decisions about the team's future, advertising partnerships and player transfers. She also acts as a therapist for athletes facing personal crises, negotiates with other clubs and manages disputes among teammates.

Continuous switching between tasks is not a sign of modern efficiency, but a very costly cognitive burden. Put simply, it is a bit like making someone get off one train and board another every five minutes, then wondering why they have not arrived on time.

· Anna Baczyล„skaThe Kozminski University professor explains why frequent task switching harms productivity.

The ability to redirect attention can be valuable in a senior role, particularly when working conditions change quickly. But frequent shifts over a longer period can damage productivity and concentration, even for highly persistent employees. Research cited by the American Psychological Association, including work by David E. Meyer, Joshua S. Rubinstein and Jeffrey E. Evans of the University of Michigan, finds that changing tasks costs time, disrupts the flow of work and increases the likelihood of mistakes.

Baczyล„ska says employees may feel exhausted โ€œlike after a marathon,โ€ while the result can resemble โ€œwalking in place.โ€ Research by Sophie Leroy on attention residue also points to the difficulty of fully leaving one task behind when attention has already moved to another.

A person is exhausted like after a marathon, while the result sometimes resembles walking in place.

· Anna Baczyล„skaShe describes the mismatch between the fatigue caused by constant interruptions and the amount of work completed.
About this summary

Originally published by Rzeczpospolita in Polish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.