Terror Plotter Allowed to Stay in UK; Wife Banned for ISIS Support
Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
TLDR
- A Bangladeshi national convicted of plotting a 2012 attack on the London Stock Exchange was permitted to remain in the UK on human rights grounds.
- Shah Rahman, sentenced to 17 years but released in 2017, had his asylum claim rejected but was allowed to stay due to fears of violating his European Convention of Human Rights.
- His wife, Parveen Purbhoo, was banned from the UK for supporting the Islamic State after evidence was found on her phone.
The Jerusalem Post reports on a deeply concerning decision by UK authorities that allowed a man convicted of plotting a terrorist attack to remain in the country, while his wife faces a ban for supporting ISIS. Shah Rahman, who pleaded guilty to preparing acts of terror against the London Stock Exchange, was released from prison in 2017 and subsequently sought asylum. Despite his conviction, which should disqualify him under the 1951 Refugee Convention, the UK Special Immigration Appeals Commission cited fears of violating his human rights if deported to Bangladesh.
This ruling raises serious questions about the UK's commitment to national security and its prioritization of human rights over the safety of its citizens. The fact that Rahman was allowed to stay, even after his asylum claim was rejected, highlights a potential loophole or a skewed application of human rights law that seems to shield individuals with a history of terrorism-related offenses.
Adding another layer of concern, Rahman's wife, Parveen Purbhoo, has been banned from entering the UK due to her suspected support for the Islamic State. Evidence found on her phone indicated a 'real risk' of her engaging in terrorism. Her appeal, which argued against including Rahman's conviction in her case, was ultimately unsuccessful, yet the primary concern remains: how can a nation effectively protect itself when individuals with proven ties to terrorist organizations are allowed to reside within its borders, or when their associates are barred on similar grounds?
From an Israeli perspective, where security threats are a constant reality, such decisions by Western nations can appear perplexing and even dangerous. The Jerusalem Post believes that while human rights are paramount, they should not come at the expense of public safety. This case underscores a critical debate about balancing individual rights with collective security, a balance that appears to have been tipped precariously in favor of the individual with a history of plotting violence.
There was a 'real risk' that Purbhoo would engage in terrorism related activity due to her suspected support of the Islamic State after dozens of Islamic State images and videos were found on her phone.
Originally published by Jerusalem Post in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.