DistantNews
Support us

The ‘anyone but Netanyahu’ coalition is not ready to lead

From Jerusalem Post · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

Opinion Sources not specified Context piece
  • Israeli opposition leaders are campaigning on the promise of removing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu from power.
  • Their focus on ousting Netanyahu risks overshadowing critical issues like rebuilding the military, restoring deterrence, and uniting the nation.
  • The election also faces voter concerns about security, accountability for the October 7 attacks, and the ability of any coalition to govern effectively.

As Israel approaches its October 27 election, the trauma of October 7 and ongoing threats from Iran loom large. Aspiring leaders like Gadi Eisenkot, Naftali Bennett, Yair Lapid, and Yair Golan appear focused on removing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, presenting it as a national vision.

As if defeating one man would rebuild the Israel Defense Forces, restore deterrence, repair public trust, unite religious and secular citizens, and answer the question that should define this election: How will the Jewish state remain secure, democratic, and strong for the next 50 years?

— AuthorThe author critiques the opposition's focus on removing Netanyahu, arguing it distracts from crucial national challenges.

However, this "anyone but Bibi" approach risks overshadowing fundamental questions about Israel's future security, democratic strength, and societal unity. Opposing Netanyahu may be understandable, but it is not a strategy for rebuilding the Israel Defense Forces, restoring deterrence, repairing public trust, or uniting religious and secular citizens. The "anyone but Bibi" slogan cannot organize Israel's future.

While many international observers expect the election to focus on Gaza, Iran, Lebanon, Washington, and the Palestinian question, Israeli voters are grappling with more immediate concerns. They are asking: Who will serve effectively? Who will investigate the failures of October 7? Can any coalition survive? Can leaders stop turning fellow citizens into enemies?

Anger is not a strategy, and “anyone but Bibi” cannot organize Israel’s future.

— AuthorThe author emphasizes the lack of a cohesive vision among opposition parties solely united by their opposition to Netanyahu.

Key issues like the demand for ultra-Orthodox military or civilian service now cross traditional political divides. Furthermore, the call for an independent state commission of inquiry into the October 7 attacks is not solely a left-wing cause. The investigation must examine the political, military, and intelligence failures that allowed Hamas to murder Israelis.

People at polling station during the Likud party internal elections in Jeursalem, July 27, 2026.

— Credit: CHAIM GOLDBERG/FLASH90This is a caption for an image, not a direct quote from the article text.

Netanyahu has served as prime minister for nearly two decades. While he has achieved accomplishments and many Israelis still respect him, the author, an Ethiopian-Israeli American Jew and Modern Orthodox educator, argues that no individual should dominate Israeli politics indefinitely. A democratic Right, the author contends, insists on elections, accountability, lawful institutions, shared service, and national responsibility, principles that must guide Israel's future regardless of who leads.

Israel has moved rightward on security, sovereignty, and the risks of territorial withdrawal, but that does not mean it must become less democratic.

— AuthorThe author discusses the political landscape in Israel, linking security concerns with democratic principles.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Jerusalem Post in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.