The backlash against gender-inclusive language is stronger than ever

The increasing use of feminist language and the subsequent backlash against gender-inclusive language have become politically charged topics in Sweden. An essay published in Svenska Dagbladet explores this phenomenon, noting that while the intention is to foster a more equal world, the discussion has ignited significant controversy.

The essay points to a digital conference titled "Backlash? Gender-inclusive language in a time of resistance" held in March, where researchers from around the globe reported on how politicians, authorities, and academic institutions are attacking gender-neutral and inclusive language. This resistance, the article suggests, is not entirely new.

“

The title usage in Sweden was still alive, and three titles worked in all situations: Herr for men and fröken or fru for women. Women's titles thus revealed civil status, men's not.

It traces the roots of the discussion back to the early 20th century, referencing Swedish author and debater Frida Stéenhoff. Stéenhoff addressed the unequal use of titles, where men were consistently addressed as "Herr" (Mr.), while women were designated as "Fröken" (Miss) or "Fru" (Mrs.). Crucially, women's titles revealed their marital status, unlike men's, creating a social hierarchy that disadvantaged women. The status of "Fru" was considered superior to "Fröken," and unmarried mothers faced particular shame, being forced to publicly declare their status through their title.

“

This caused problems for women. The titles ranked. A fru was indeed much finer than a fröken. It was worst of all for all unmarried mothers – who had to flaunt their shame at every meeting.