TNG appeals rejection of proposed Vuda Energy Project
Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- TNG Holdings (Fiji) has appealed the rejection of its Vuda Energy-from-Waste project.
- The company argues the Environment Department misinterpreted its powers and denied procedural fairness.
- TNG seeks a transparent, evidence-based assessment process for its project.
TNG Holdings (Fiji) Pte Limited is challenging the Environment Department's decision to reject its proposed Vuda Energy-from-Waste project by lodging an appeal with the Environmental Tribunal. The company seeks to overturn the rejection, with TNG Director Rob Cromb emphasizing a desire for a comprehensive, transparent, and evidence-based assessment process that aligns with the Environment Management Act.
The company wants the project assessed through a complete, transparent, and evidence-based process consistent with the Environment Management Act.
The grounds for appeal include claims that the Environment Department overstepped its authority by stating it could not request further information after the Environmental Impact Assessment was submitted, a power TNG asserts is granted by law. The company also alleges a lack of procedural fairness, stating it did not receive advance notice of technical questions raised during a review committee meeting. TNG contends that the review committee's report was largely prepared before their consultation meeting and that third-party submissions were considered without TNG having an opportunity to respond.
The law allows the department to seek additional information during the assessment process.
Furthermore, TNG claims the rejection decision cited missing information that was already included in their submitted documents. The company asserts it provided detailed written responses to the review committee's questions within five days, but there is no evidence these responses were reviewed before the rejection was issued. Cromb stated that the appeal aims to ensure that major projects of national significance undergo a fair and accountable assessment process.
The company alleges the review committeeโs report was substantially prepared before its consultation meeting took place and that third-party submissions were considered without giving TNG an opportunity to respond.
Originally published by FBC News. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.