'Top Instructor' Woo Hyun-jin Denies Illicit Exam Question Trading Charges in First Trial
Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
TLDR
- Popular instructor Woo Hyun-jin, known as an 'il-ta' (top-tier) lecturer, denied charges of illegally trading exam questions in his first trial.
- Woo and the teachers accused of providing the questions are charged with violating the Improper Gifts and Services Solicitation Prohibition Act.
- Prosecutors allege Woo paid over 422 million won (approximately $300,000 USD) to three teachers for mock exam questions between March 2020 and May 2023.
The legal battle involving renowned 'il-ta' lecturer Woo Hyun-jin has commenced, with Woo vehemently denying all charges at his first court appearance. Accused of violating the Improper Gifts and Services Solicitation Prohibition Act, Woo and several teachers allegedly engaged in the illicit trading of mock exam questions, a practice that strikes at the integrity of South Korea's highly competitive education system.
Prosecutors laid out their case, alleging that Woo, along with an employee from his publishing company, paid a staggering 422 million won (approximately $300,000 USD) to three teachers over a period of more than three years for access to sensitive exam materials. This alleged transaction forms the core of the charges, painting a picture of a system where lucrative private education potentially exploits public educators for unfair advantage.
Woo's defense team countered by asserting that the payments were for legitimate services and did not constitute bribery or solicitation under the relevant law. The teachers involved have also pleaded not guilty. This trial is being closely watched, as it touches upon the immense influence and financial power within the private tutoring industry, often referred to as 'hagwon' culture. The outcome could have significant implications for how educational materials are sourced and how the line between legitimate business and corruption is drawn in this high-stakes sector.
We paid a legitimate price for the questions and received them; it does not fall under the Improper Gifts and Services Solicitation Prohibition Act.
Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.