Tribunal nears verdict in Awami League leaders' uprising case
Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- An International Crimes Tribunal is set to deliver a verdict in a case against Awami League General Secretary Obaidul Quader and six other leaders over alleged atrocities during the July uprising.
- All seven accused are absconding, with the prosecution seeking the highest punishment and the defense arguing insufficient evidence.
- The prosecution presented an audio recording allegedly implicating Quader in suppressing protests.
The International Crimes Tribunal-2 is preparing to deliver a verdict in a high-profile case against Awami League General Secretary Obaidul Quader and six other party leaders. The charges stem from alleged atrocities committed during the July uprising in 2024. The tribunal has kept the case for judgment after both the prosecution and defense concluded their arguments.
All seven accused are currently absconding. The prosecution has called for the maximum punishment, asserting that the charges against them have been proven. They portrayed Quader as a central figure in suppressing the mass uprising, alleging he directed the mobilization of the Awami League and its affiliated organizations against protesters. The prosecution also presented an audio recording, which forensic examination reportedly authenticated, in which Quader is heard questioning why protesters were not being beaten and allowed to "grow." The prosecution claims this led to armed Bangladesh Chhatra League (BCL) men attacking unarmed students on July 15, 2024, injuring over 300.
Conversely, the defense argued that the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond a reasonable doubt and requested the accused be discharged. The tribunal had framed charges against the seven individuals on January 22, 2024. The case now awaits the tribunal's decision.
why protesters were not being beaten and why they were being allowed to โgrowโ.
Originally published by Daily Star in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.