Trump administration withdraws subpoenas against New York Times journalists

The Trump administration has officially withdrawn subpoenas that compelled journalists from The New York Times to provide their phone records and testimony. These subpoenas were issued in connection with an article that reported on alleged security vulnerabilities in the president's new Air Force One aircraft.

“

The Government is prepared to unilaterally withdraw the subpoenas at this time.

The decision to withdraw came after a federal court hearing in New York, where Judge Arun Subramanian questioned the prosecution's "unintentional errors" in seeking the subpoenas. The judge also considered imposing sanctions for alleged perjury in the application process. The New York Times had previously urged the court to quash the subpoenas, labeling them an attempt to intimidate their reporters.

Prosecutor Sean Buckley informed the judge that the government was prepared to "unilaterally withdraw the subpoenas at this time." However, a spokesperson for the Department of Justice told CNN that the investigation into leaks of classified information is ongoing. "We will pursue justice against those who threaten national security by leaking classified information, a serious federal crime," the spokesperson stated.

“

We will pursue justice against those who threaten national security by leaking classified information, a serious federal crime.

The reporters had received the subpoenas on July 10, demanding their testimony and phone records, as well as those of their family members. The goal was to identify the sources who provided information about the security of the new Boeing 747, which was reportedly delivered by Qatar. The article in question highlighted concerns among federal officials about the lack of defensive countermeasures on the new Air Force One, similar to those on the previous presidential aircraft, potentially posing a risk during international travel.

“

We are pleased that the government has finally admitted that the subpoenas violated the law, but they never should have been issued in the first place.

David McCraw, an attorney for The New York Times, expressed relief, stating, "We are pleased that the government has finally admitted that the subpoenas violated the law, but they never should have been issued in the first place." Bruce D. Brown, president of the Committee to Protect Journalists, criticized the administration's actions as an "abuse of governmental power," adding that attempts to harass journalists to "curry favor with the White House" had failed in federal courts.

“

The judge clearly saw what the Department of Justice's attempt was: a blatant and reckless abuse of governmental power.