Trump administration withdraws support for annual Arctic environmental report
Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- The Trump administration has withdrawn support for NOAA's annual Arctic Report Card, a key environmental assessment.
- The report, ongoing since 2006, tracks changes in the Arctic's atmosphere, oceans, cryosphere, and tundra, which is warming four times faster than the global average.
- Scientists are working to ensure the report's continuation beyond 2026, citing the region's critical role in national security and global climate.
The Trump administration has ended its support for the annual Arctic Report Card, a vital publication that has tracked environmental changes in the rapidly warming region since 2006. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) confirmed its withdrawal of support, stating it would no longer facilitate the report's coordination.
Coordination of the 2026 Arctic Report Card will not be facilitated through NOAA โฆ All data historically contributed by NOAA to the product will continue to be collected and will remain publicly available.
Despite the cut in federal backing, NOAA communications director Kim Doster assured that data collected by the agency for the report would remain publicly available. Doster also emphasized that other NOAA programs would continue to support Arctic research crucial for national security, weather prediction, navigation safety, and coastal economies.
The Arctic Report Card is a peer-reviewed assessment detailing critical shifts in the Arctic's atmosphere, oceans, ice, and land. The region is warming four times faster than the rest of the planet, experiencing severe sea ice loss, carbon sink reversals, and ecosystem disruptions. Recent reports highlighted record-warm surface temperatures and the lowest annual maximum sea ice extent in the satellite record.
We are scrambling to pull the pieces together. I am optimistic that we can find a path forward for 2027 and beyond. Given the late date, whether we can pull it together for 2026 is an open question, but weโre trying to make it happen.
Scientists involved in the report are actively seeking ways to continue its publication. Rick Thoman, the report's lead editor, expressed optimism about finding a path forward for 2027 and beyond, though the timeline for the 2026 report remains uncertain. Twila Moon, another editor, stressed the U.S. is an Arctic nation and the report's findings are vital for understanding national interests in the region.
The US is an Arctic nation. Itโs not just a distant place. Itโs also our national place. So many
Originally published by The Guardian in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.