Trump alleges fraud in California primaries, cites vote count delays
Translated from Spanish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Donald Trump alleged widespread fraud and manipulation in California's primary elections without providing evidence.
- He criticized the delay in vote counting, questioning the legitimacy of the process.
- California's vote-by-mail system allows ballots postmarked by election day to be counted up to seven days later.
Donald Trump has again cast doubt on the integrity of U.S. elections, this time targeting California's primary contests. He claimed without evidence that the state's elections were "rigged" and that "fraud" was occurring due to the slow pace of counting votes.
"Do you think it is appropriate that they have an election and five days later they are not even close to picking a winner?" Trump asked during an interview with NBC News, directly challenging the legitimacy of the electoral process. When pressed for tangible evidence, he simply responded, "All I have to do is look."
California's election laws permit ballots with election day postmarks to be counted if received up to seven days after the vote. This system, particularly for mail-in ballots, often leads to delayed final results. Media projections indicate Democrat Xavier Becerra is likely to advance to the general election for governor, while the Republican nominee remains undecided between Tom Steyer and Steve Hilton, whom Trump publicly supports.
This is not the first time Trump has attacked California's voting system. He has previously made unsubstantiated claims on social media that Democrats cheated in the state's primaries. He also alleged that the Department of Justice was investigating the election process in California, the nation's most populous state and a Democratic stronghold. Trump's persistent accusations of electoral fraud echo his unsubstantiated claims following the 2020 presidential election, which he lost to Joe Biden.
Originally published by ABC Color in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.