Trump canceled last attack on Iran, now Israeli sources fear that green light might never come
Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Israeli officials fear that U.S. President Donald Trump may not approve a response to Iranian attacks, potentially forcing Israel to act alone.
- Trump conveyed a desire for a measured reaction after Iran's ballistic-missile attack, leading to the cancellation of a larger Israeli strike.
- Concerns are rising that Trump's focus on a diplomatic agreement with Iran might prevent even symbolic strikes in future escalations.
Growing concern permeates Jerusalem that U.S. President Donald Trump might withhold approval for Israel to respond to Iranian attacks, even with a limited strike. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated at a security cabinet meeting that Israel might have to confront Iran alone, despite the associated costs. "We do not want to reach that point, but we know we are capable of it," he said.
We may have to strike without American backing, despite all the costs involved.
Following Iran's ballistic-missile attack, Trump spoke with Netanyahu, conveying a desire for a measured reaction rather than explicitly forbidding an Israeli response. This conversation occurred as Israel was preparing a significantly larger strike involving approximately 50 aircraft targeting multiple sites. Trump's communication, coupled with a message from Tehran indicating a halt in firing, ultimately led to the cancellation of the planned operation.
We do not want to reach that point, but we know we are capable of it.
The primary concern in Israel is that Trump's prioritization of a diplomatic agreement with Iran could lead him to oppose even symbolic strikes in future escalations. Sources familiar with the matter indicate noticeable progress between Tehran and Washington regarding a potential agreement. Trump himself has expressed optimism about signing an agreement soon, though reports suggest he is frustrated with the negotiation process and the Iranian side's handling of talks.
We are close to an agreement.
IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Eyal Zamir indicated that the military believes almost any deal with Iran would be unfavorable. Meanwhile, U.S. Vice President JD Vance stated that any agreement would be in the best interest of the United States, regardless of Israel's preference.
At the beginning of the week, there was noticeable progress between Tehran and Washington regarding a possible agreement.
Originally published by Jerusalem Post. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.