Twelve US states sue to block Paramount’s Warner Bros takeover

A coalition of twelve U.S. states, spearheaded by California, has filed a lawsuit aiming to halt the $110 billion takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery by Paramount Skydance. The states contend that this merger, potentially the largest in Hollywood's history, poses a significant threat to competition within the film and television industry.

“

higher prices, lower quality, and less content

The lawsuit, lodged in federal court in northern California, represents a major regulatory challenge to the deal, which had previously received approval from the Trump administration's Justice Department. The combined entity would oversee a vast array of assets, including CNN, Warner Bros. Pictures, and the HBO Max streaming service. The deal has also attracted political attention, with President Donald Trump indicating he would consider the fate of CNN, a frequent target of his criticism.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, leading the coalition, asserted that merging two of Hollywood's five major film distributors would result in "higher prices, lower quality, and less content" for audiences. He emphasized the importance of free and fair markets, stating, "In this country, no one is above the law."

“

In this country, no one is above the law.

The states, all governed by Democrats, allege that the merger violates the Clayton Act, a federal law designed to prevent mergers that substantially reduce competition. Joining California in the suit are Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, and Washington.

“

fundamentally flawed.

Paramount has strongly refuted the lawsuit, labeling it "fundamentally flawed." The company argues that the legal challenge would unfairly protect dominant streaming platforms like Netflix and other tech companies from necessary competition. Paramount maintains that the merger would create a more formidable competitor to streaming services such as Netflix, Amazon, and Apple, and has committed to releasing at least 30 films annually with a minimum 45-day theatrical window. The company also noted that competition regulators in 24 other jurisdictions have already approved the transaction.

“

The practical effect of this lawsuit is to shield those dominant streaming platforms like Netflix and technology companies from much needed competition.