U.S. prosecutor recommends 27-month prison sentence for Danish researcher
Translated from Danish and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.
At a glance
- Prosecutors in Georgia recommend 27 months in prison for Danish researcher and doctor Poul Thorsen, who admitted misusing U.S. research funds.
- Thorsen agreed to pay $1 million in restitution to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which provided the funding.
- A judge in Atlanta is expected to decide the sentence on December 1 after Thorsenโs extradition from Germany and detention in the United States.
Danish researcher and doctor Poul Thorsen has agreed to pay $1 million to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention after admitting that he misused research money, while a Georgia prosecutor recommends a 27-month prison sentence.
The proposed sentence appears in a plea agreement signed by the 65-year-old Thorsen and U.S. prosecutors. A judge in Atlanta is expected to set the final punishment on December 1. Thorsen has remained in pretrial detention in Georgia since arriving in the United States.
The case dates back years, to Thorsenโs time as a visiting researcher at the CDC in Atlanta. From 2000 through 2009, the agency awarded $11 million for research to be conducted in Denmark at Odense University Hospital and Aarhus University. The work included research into a possible connection between autism and vaccines.
U.S. authorities accused Thorsen of using more than $1 million for unrelated purposes, including a Harley-Davidson motorcycle, cars and a house in Atlanta. Denmark later refused to extradite him for trial in the United States. Last summer, however, German authorities arrested him in southern Germany while he was traveling by train back to Denmark after a holiday in Austria.
After a lengthy process and several protests, Germany extradited him to the United States in May. The judgeโs decision will determine the sentence under the agreement.
Originally published by Berlingske in Danish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.