Ulsan, Gyeongnam Mayoral and Gubernatorial Races Stall on Opposition Unification

As the June 3 local elections loom, the crucial issue of candidate unification between the Democratic Party and the Progressive Party in Ulsan and Gyeongnam is facing significant hurdles. The urgency is palpable, with election day drawing nearer and the specter of a divided opposition playing into the hands of the ruling People Power Party.

Despite the Progressive Party's consistent calls for a united front at the metropolitan and provincial levels, the Democratic Party has adopted a notably passive stance. This deadlock persists even as the deadline for candidate registration approaches. The Democratic Party appears to be calculating that delaying negotiations will create a more favorable landscape for them as the election date nears, a strategy that leaves Progressive Party officials anxiously awaiting a response by April 30.

“

We are waiting for the Democratic Party's answer by the 30th.

Candidates who have vocally supported unification are growing increasingly frustrated by the lack of progress. In the Ulsan mayoral race, polls show a tight contest between the Democratic Party's Kim Sang-wook and the incumbent from the People Power Party, Kim Du-gyeom, with the Progressive Party's Kim Jong-hoon and independent Park Maeng-woo trailing. The situation in Gyeongnam, where the Democratic Party's Kim Gyeong-soo is in a strong position against the People Power Party's Park Wan-soo, also hinges on the potential unification with Progressive Party candidate Jeon Hee-young.

While the Democratic Party suggests that broader alliance discussions, encompassing mayoral, gubernatorial, and even by-elections, will intensify after candidate nominations are finalized, the current stalemate raises concerns. From a local perspective in Ulsan and Gyeongnam, the failure to present a united front could be seen as a missed opportunity to challenge the established political order, potentially allowing the People Power Party to retain power through strategic division.

“

Alliance discussions are linked to metropolitan and local council races, as well as National Assembly by-elections. Discussions will likely intensify after nominations are finalized.