DistantNews
Support us
UNAM scientist defends environmental viability of fertilizer plant in Topolobampo; dismisses sea discharge concerns
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico /Environment & Climate

UNAM scientist defends environmental viability of fertilizer plant in Topolobampo; dismisses sea discharge concerns

From El Universal · () Spanish

Translated from Spanish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • A UNAM researcher asserts that the proposed fertilizer plant in Topolobampo, Mexico, is environmentally viable and poses no risk to the bay or marine life.
  • Concerns about ammonia discharges are unfounded, as the compound will be used industrially, not released as waste.
  • The plant's water usage will be minimal, and cooling systems will limit environmental impact.

Federico Pรกez Osuna, an emeritus researcher at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), has declared the planned fertilizer plant in Topolobampo, Mexico, to be environmentally sound. He specifically refuted claims that the facility, operated by Gas y Petroquรญmica de Occidente (GPO), would pose a contamination risk to the local bay or its marine ecosystems.

A primary concern raised against the project involved potential ammonia discharges into the sea. However, Pรกez Osuna explained that the plant will utilize ammonia as a key component in its industrial processes rather than releasing it as waste. "The plant is not going to be dumping ammonia there. There will be no discharge to the sea. The plant will produce it, pack it and it will be commercialized. So, is there such a discharge to the sea? Not at all," he stated.

The plant is not going to be dumping ammonia there. There will be no discharge to the sea. The plant will produce it, pack it and it will be commercialized. So, is there such a discharge to the sea? Not at all.

โ€” Federico Pรกez OsunaFederico Pรกez Osuna, an emeritus researcher at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), defended the environmental viability of the Gas y Petroquรญmica de Occidente (GPO) fertilizer plant planned for Topolobampo, Mexico. He specifically addressed concerns about ammonia discharges into the sea.

He further clarified that the only water returned to the environment will come from the plant's cooling system. The impact of this discharge on temperature and salinity is expected to be confined to a small area of two to three hectares. The project also includes cooling towers and treatment processes designed to minimize any environmental footprint. Pรกez Osuna noted that the plant's water consumption will be less than that of a conventional thermoelectric plant and comparable to a shrimp farm of 130 to 150 hectares.

Referencing global operations, Pรกez Osuna pointed out that approximately 320 ammonia plants operate worldwide, with 32 in the United States, none of which have generated social conflicts due to environmental damage. He highlighted Topolobampo's strategic advantages for such an industry, including natural gas availability and port infrastructure. Pรกez Osuna urged for public debate to be based on scientific evidence and verifiable information, expressing confidence that the plant can coexist with the region's fishing activities, similar to how other industries have operated in the bay for decades.

The plant will not be discharging ammonia into the sea. There will be no waste discharged into the sea. The plant will produce it, pack it, and it will be commercialized. So, is there such a discharge to the sea? Not at all.

โ€” Federico Pรกez OsunaFederico Pรกez Osuna, an emeritus researcher at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), stated that the proposed fertilizer plant in Topolobampo would not release ammonia into the sea, as the compound would be used in the industrial process and then packaged for sale.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by El Universal in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.