Uruguay proposal seeks to reform transparency board director appointments amid credibility concerns

Uruguay's Transparency and Public Ethics Board (Jutep) faces mounting criticism for alleged politicization and a perceived loss of credibility. These concerns have intensified following a favorable ruling for the president of the State Health Services Administration (ASSE), Álvaro Danza, and more recently, anonymous complaints against President Yamandú Orsi regarding the purchase of a hybrid SUV.

In response to these issues, Colorado party deputy Conrado Rodríguez plans to introduce a bill to reform the appointment process for Jutep's three directors. The proposed legislation aims to strengthen the agency's impartiality and public trust.

“

members of the board shall be lawyers who have effectively held the position of magistrate of the Judiciary, the Contentious Administrative Court, or the Public Ministry (Prosecutor's Office) for a minimum period of 10 years.

Rodríguez's bill seeks to mandate that Jutep directors must be lawyers with at least 10 years of experience as magistrates in the Judiciary, the Contentious Administrative Court, or the Public Prosecutor's Office. Additionally, they must be citizens of recognized moral standing, whose careers and national standing guarantee impartiality and independence.

“

citizens of recognized moral standing, who by their trajectory and position on the national political scene are a guarantee of impartiality and independence.

The explanatory statement for the bill argues that while current regulations mention the need for professionals of "recognized experience and professional and moral solvency," experience has shown the need to enhance technical suitability and impartiality guarantees. This is especially crucial for an agency whose mission demands absolute credibility and distance from partisan politics.

Rodríguez believes these requirements will elevate appointment standards. Nominees would need not only a deep understanding of public, administrative, criminal, and procedural law but also proven experience in impartial conflict resolution, evidence analysis, due process, and public interest protection. The proposal has reportedly garnered support from some National Party legislators.

“

experience has shown the convenience of strengthening the requirements of technical suitability and guarantee of impartiality, especially in an agency whose mission requires absolute credibility and distance from partisan contingencies.