US Allows Venezuelan Government to Pay Maduro's Legal Fees Amid Sanctions Shift
Translated from Spanish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
TLDR
- The US has amended sanctions to allow Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro's government to pay legal fees for his defense in a New York drug trafficking case.
- Amended licenses permit payments under specific conditions, including funds available after March 5, 2026, and not derived from Foreign Deposit Funds.
- This decision marks a shift from previous administrations that blocked such payments, with Maduro's defense arguing it violated his Sixth Amendment rights.
In a significant development that signals a potential recalibration of U.S. policy towards Venezuela, Washington has authorized payments for the legal defense of Nicolás Maduro, the embattled leader of the South American nation. This move, detailed in amended sanctions licenses issued by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), allows the Venezuelan government to pay the fees for lawyers representing Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, in their ongoing drug trafficking case in New York. The conditions attached to these payments—requiring funds to be available after March 5, 2026, and not sourced from specific government deposit funds—suggest a carefully calibrated approach by the U.S. administration.
These amended licenses authorize defense counsel to receive payments from the Government of Venezuela under certain conditions, including the conditions that the authorized payments are made with funds available to the Government of Venezuela after March 5, 2026; and the authorized payments are not derived from Foreign Deposit Funds.
This decision represents a notable departure from the hardline stance previously adopted by the Trump administration, which had actively blocked access to funds for Maduro's defense. The legal team, led by attorney Barry Pollack, had consistently argued that the inability to secure legal representation due to financial constraints infringed upon Maduro's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. The U.S. court's eventual agreement to modify sanctions, particularly after a judge noted that Maduro no longer posed a national security threat following his capture and transfer to the U.S., underscores the evolving legal and political considerations surrounding the case.
This decision represents a shift in the strategy of the Department of Justice and the administration of President Donald Trump, who had until now blocked access to these funds citing national security and foreign policy reasons.
The implications of this development extend beyond the courtroom. It occurs amidst ongoing efforts to normalize bilateral relations between the United States and Venezuela, following a rupture in 2019. The recent meeting between Venezuela's interim president, Delcy Rodríguez, and the new U.S. charge d'affaires in Caracas, John Barrett, signifies a renewed dialogue aimed at improving diplomatic ties. While the U.S. has not recognized Maduro's government, these actions suggest a pragmatic engagement that acknowledges the realities on the ground and potentially seeks avenues for de-escalation and stability in the region. From our perspective in Venezuela, this is a complex development, reflecting both the internal political dynamics of the U.S. and the ongoing international efforts to navigate the Venezuelan crisis.
after his capture and transfer to the U.S., the couple no longer represented 'a threat to national security'.
Originally published by El País in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.