US appeals judge's order to refund $166 billion in annulled tariffs
Translated from Spanish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- The U.S. government appealed a judge's order to refund companies for tariffs annulled earlier this year.
- The annulled tariffs, initially imposed by the Trump administration, could amount to $166 billion.
- The appeal could disrupt the ongoing refund process managed by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
The U.S. government is challenging a judicial order that mandates the refund of billions of dollars in tariffs annulled by the Supreme Court. The administration is seeking to halt the repayment process, which could potentially return $166 billion to companies that were subjected to the levies.
A judge had previously directed the Trump administration to initiate the refund process after the Supreme Court invalidated the global tariffs. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) had already begun processing these reimbursements, with approximately $85 billion in refunds in the pipeline and $20.6 billion already approved.
However, the new appeal introduces uncertainty into this operation. The tariffs in question were imposed by former President Donald Trump, who utilized emergency laws to apply different levies to various countries. The Supreme Court ruled in February that Trump had exceeded his authority in imposing these tariffs.
Hundreds of companies, from small businesses to large corporations like FedEx and Costco, have sought to recover these funds. Trump has previously suggested he would remember American companies that did not seek refunds, hinting at potential future favoritism. This latest legal maneuver by the government could significantly impact the financial recovery for numerous importers.
The U.S. government appealed the decision of a judge who ordered the refund to companies of the tariffs annulled earlier this year by the Supreme Court.
Originally published by El Universal in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.