DistantNews
Support us
US citizen charged after phone wiped during CBP inspection
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท Argentina /Crime & Justice

US citizen charged after phone wiped during CBP inspection

From La Naciรณn · () Spanish

Translated from Spanish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources In the courts
  • A US citizen faces federal obstruction charges after his phone's data was wiped when customs agents attempted to access it at Atlanta's Hartsfield-Jackson Airport.
  • Samuel Tunick allegedly provided a different passcode, causing his Google Pixel to reset and destroy its contents before agents could seize the device.
  • Prosecutors are using a little-known federal statute that criminalizes destroying property to prevent government seizure, carrying a maximum penalty of five years in prison.

Samuel Tunick, a US citizen residing in Atlanta, is facing a federal obstruction charge after his smartphone's data was erased when U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents tried to access it at Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport. The incident occurred when Tunick was detained for secondary inspection and asked to unlock his Google Pixel. Agents warned him they would confiscate the device if he refused.

Tunick provided a passcode that, according to his defense motion, caused the phone's screen to go blank, flicker, and then restart, effectively wiping all digital content before the authorities could examine it. Despite this, agents seized the phone and allowed Tunick to enter the U.S.

A grand jury indicted Tunick in November 2025. He pleaded not guilty, and a hearing was held in July 2026 in a federal court in Atlanta. Prosecutors are invoking a rarely used federal statute that makes it a felony to destroy property to prevent or hinder government seizure. This law can apply before, during, or after a search and carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison.

The prosecution's argument hinges on the intent behind Tunick's actions, asserting he provided the code knowing it would erase the evidence. The defense, however, is challenging the legality of the inspection, arguing Tunick's detention and the phone's seizure were unlawful. They claim agents failed to inform him of his rights and repeatedly denied his requests to speak with an attorney, suggesting the search for material was a pretext.

DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by La Naciรณn in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.