DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel /Crime & Justice

US court rejects Trump bid to re-detain pro-Palestinian scholar

From Jerusalem Post · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Outcome reported
  • A US appeals court rejected the Trump administration's attempt to re-detain a Georgetown University scholar who advocated for Palestinian rights.
  • The court ruled that federal immigration law did not prevent a lower court judge from ordering the release of Badar Khan Suri, an Indian citizen, based on due process and free speech claims.
  • This decision contrasts with other federal appeals courts that have overturned similar releases of pro-Palestinian activists.

A US appeals court has rebuffed an effort by the Trump administration to detain a Georgetown University scholar advocating for Palestinian rights. The Richmond-based 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 that immigration law does not bar judges from ordering the release of individuals like Badar Khan Suri if their detention is challenged on constitutional grounds.

Suri, an Indian citizen, was arrested in March 2025 as part of a broader administration campaign targeting foreign nationals involved in pro-Palestinian activism on US campuses. The court found that Suri's claims of due process and free speech violations under the US Constitution could be heard, even while deportation proceedings were pending.

Whether the Government has chosen to detain Suri to punish his speech and associations and to chill and deter future speech, and whether it constitutionally may do so, are different questions from whether the Government has and may seek to remove Suri because of his speech and associations.

โ€” US Circuit Judge DeAndrea BenjaminWriting for the majority opinion on the 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals.

US Circuit Judge DeAndrea Benjamin, writing for the majority, stated that the government's motives for detention, whether to punish speech or deter future activism, are separate from the question of whether the individual can be removed due to their speech. The ruling was supported by judges appointed by Democratic presidents, while a judge appointed by Ronald Reagan dissented, viewing the decision as a setback for the immigration system.

The Department of Homeland Security, which oversees immigration enforcement, has not yet commented on the ruling. Suri resided in Virginia at the time of his arrest.

a loss for the immigration system Congress carefully designed.

โ€” US Circuit Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson IIIIn his dissenting opinion on the ruling.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Jerusalem Post in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.