US media slams Trump's Iran concessions in war-ending deal

American media outlets have largely criticized President Donald Trump's concessions to Iran in a deal intended to end the war in West Asia. Critics argue that the agreement abandons the war's initial objectives, strengthens Iran's position, and represents a significant financial expenditure without yielding the expected results.

Trump signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) during a candlelit dinner ceremony outside Paris, aiming to conclude the conflict that has destabilized the region and impacted the global economy. The MoU explicitly calls for the immediate opening of the Strait of Hormuz and the lifting of US blockades on Iran's ports.

While the agreement is seen as a step towards ending the war, media commentary highlights concerns that Iran's power has consolidated and that substantial financial resources have been expended. The narrative suggests a departure from the initial strategic goals, leading to a situation where Iran emerges stronger despite the costs incurred.

The deal initiates a 60-day negotiation period for a final settlement. However, the critical reception in US media underscores a perception that the concessions made may not align with the original objectives of the conflict, raising questions about the effectiveness and long-term implications of the agreement.