DistantNews
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel /Conflict & Security

US potentially facing 'near-term risk' of running out of key ammunition after Iran war - report

From Jerusalem Post · (8h ago) English Critical tone

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

TLDR

  • The US military faces a 'near-term risk' of depleted key missile stockpiles after extensive use in Operation Epic Fury against Iran, according to a CNN report citing experts.
  • It could take three to five years to fully replenish stockpiles, with significant percentages of THAAD, Patriot, Precision Strike Missiles, Tomahawk, and other missiles expended.
  • While current stockpiles may suffice for further operations against Iran, they might be insufficient to counter other adversaries like China, raising concerns about a 'window of increased vulnerability.'

A report highlighted by The Jerusalem Post raises serious concerns about the United States' military readiness following its recent engagement in Operation Epic Fury against Iran. Experts cited by CNN suggest that the significant depletion of key missile stockpiles has created a "near-term risk" for the US, potentially leaving it vulnerable in the face of other global threats.

The United States military may have created a โ€œnear-term riskโ€ of running out of key missiles after depleting a significant amount of ammunition during Operation Epic Fury against Iran, according to a Wednesday CNN News report citing experts and individuals familiar with recent US Defense Department stockpile assessments.

โ€” CNN News ReportReporting on the potential depletion of US missile stockpiles.

The analysis from the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) indicates that replenishing these critical assets could take an extended period of three to five years. The scale of expenditure is substantial, with nearly half of THAAD and Patriot air defense missiles, and significant portions of Precision Strike Missiles, Tomahawk, and other advanced munitions, having been used. This depletion is not merely a logistical challenge; it directly impacts the US's ability to project power and respond to potential conflicts on multiple fronts.

it may take three to five years to fully replenish the stockpile to pre-war levels, despite the Pentagon's recent signing of a series of contracts to expand missile production.

โ€” Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)Assessing the timeline for replenishing missile stockpiles.

While Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell has publicly denied that the reduction in stockpiles poses a threat, asserting the military has all it needs, the CSIS assessment paints a more cautious picture. The report suggests that while the remaining ammunition might be adequate for continued operations against Iran, it could prove insufficient in a scenario involving a peer competitor like China. This creates a "window of increased vulnerability in the western Pacific," a critical region for US strategic interests.

Since the war began on February 28, the US has expended at least half of its inventory of Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) missiles, almost half of its Patriot air defense missiles, and at least 45% of its stockpile of Precision Strike Missiles, CSIS assessed.

โ€” CSISQuantifying the expenditure of key missile systems.

From a US perspective, this situation underscores the immense cost of prolonged military engagements and the complex calculus involved in maintaining global military superiority. The reliance on extensive missile stockpiles, while effective in conflict, necessitates a robust and rapid replenishment strategy. The Jerusalem Post's reporting on this issue brings to light the critical strategic questions facing US defense planners as they navigate a complex geopolitical landscape.

the depletion of the key ammunition has โ€œcreated a window of increased vulnerability in the western Pacific.โ€

โ€” Mark CancianHighlighting the strategic implications of depleted stockpiles.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Jerusalem Post. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.