DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel /Conflict & Security

US should have seized Strait of Hormuz militarily, retired Israeli general says

From Jerusalem Post · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

Interview Named sources Context piece
  • A retired Israeli brigadier general believes the US should have militarily controlled the Strait of Hormuz.
  • He argues that the US-Iran memorandum of understanding creates dangerous uncertainty regarding the strait's openness and Israel's options.
  • The general suggests the US should be willing to fight to ensure global freedom of shipment, not just rely on agreements.

Retired Israeli Brigadier General Amir Avivi expressed surprise that the United States did not take military control of the Strait of Hormuz, arguing that the emerging US-Iran memorandum of understanding leaves dangerous uncertainty. Avivi believes this uncertainty affects Israel's freedom of action and the future pressure on Tehran.

As a general, I must say Iโ€™m very, very surprised the US didnโ€™t take over militarily the strait.

โ€” Brig.-Gen. (ret.) Amir AviviExpressing surprise at the US approach to the Strait of Hormuz.

Avivi questioned the memorandum's premise, stating that if the strait were truly open, a deal to open it would be unnecessary. He suggested that the agreement to release a blockade in exchange for Iran opening the strait implies the waterway is not fully open. "If the strait was open completely, the way it's described, you wouldnโ€™t need this deal at all, because this deal is just about opening the strait," Avivi said.

If the strait was open completely, the way it's described, you wouldnโ€™t need this deal at all, because this deal is just about opening the strait.

โ€” Brig.-Gen. (ret.) Amir AviviQuestioning the necessity of the US-Iran agreement if the Strait of Hormuz were truly open.

He asserted that a country as powerful as the United States should be able to militarily control the strait and guarantee freedom of shipment. "And itโ€™s not happening. This is not good news," he added. Avivi criticized the current approach, suggesting it signals to Iran, Hezbollah, and other Iranian-backed forces that pressure is easing and Washington is less willing to engage militarily.

A country as powerful as the United States, he argued, โ€œshould be able to control militarily the strait and ensure freedom of shipment in the strait.โ€

โ€” Brig.-Gen. (ret.) Amir AviviStating his view on the US's military responsibility in the Strait of Hormuz.

Avivi clarified that he is not advocating for open-ended wars, but rather for a willingness to fight for values and global freedom of shipment. He described the US-Iran document as provisional and limited, not a final agreement that should dictate Israel's military calculations. "Itโ€™s a memorandum of understanding. Itโ€™s not a binding contract," he stated.

Now, we cannot be a power if youโ€™re not willing to fight, if youโ€™re not willing to take chances, and if youโ€™re not willing to have casualties.

โ€” Brig.-Gen. (ret.) Amir AviviArguing for a stronger US military posture to ensure global freedom of shipment.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Jerusalem Post in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.