DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Indonesia /Economy & Trade

US Train Travel Lags Behind Asia and Europe Despite Passenger Boom

From Tempo · () Indonesian

Translated from Indonesian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified Context piece
  • US train travel is experiencing a resurgence in passenger numbers, driven by rising airfare and fuel costs.
  • However, the US rail network lacks the high-speed services common in Europe and Asia, despite having more track mileage globally.
  • This disconnect stems from a 20th-century prioritization of highway and airport development over passenger rail, favoring freight over speed.

Passenger train travel in the United States is experiencing a notable revival, with record numbers of travelers in the past two years. This surge is partly attributed to the persistently high costs of aviation fuel and gasoline, making train travel a more attractive option for the summer season.

Despite this growing popularity, travelers unfamiliar with the US rail system may encounter limitations. Many cities lack robust rail connections, and the country does not widely offer the high-speed rail services that are standard in Europe and East Asia. This situation presents a paradox, as the US possesses more railroad track than any other nation worldwide.

The disconnect between extensive infrastructure and limited high-speed passenger service can be traced back to mid-20th century policy decisions. While European countries have long viewed passenger trains as essential public infrastructure, the US government prioritized federal funding for highways and airports over railroads. This shift made automobile and air travel more efficient and convenient than rail.

Consequently, the legacy of this prioritization continues today, with much of the nation's track infrastructure designed primarily for heavy freight transport rather than high-speed passenger movement. Amtrak's most popular route, the Northeast Corridor connecting Boston and Washington D.C., exemplifies this. Covering 457 miles in approximately seven hours, it is significantly slower than comparable European routes, such as the Napoli to Milan line in Italy, which takes under five hours.

Experts like Allan Zarembski from the University of Delaware's railroad engineering program explain that the Northeast Corridor's curves, shaped by the existing landscape, prevent high-speed trains. Altering these tracks to straighten them would be an extremely costly endeavor, involving land acquisition in densely populated areas. Meanwhile, ambitious projects like California's high-speed rail initiative, launched in 2008 with the goal of connecting Los Angeles and San Francisco, remain stalled in the planning stages, earning the moniker "train to nowhere."

Straightening out the track is a very expensive proposition. I have to acquire the land. The land is owned by somebody, and often that somebody doesn't want to sell it. โ€ฆ We're talking about going through the most densely populated portion of the United States.

โ€” Allan ZarembskiZarembski explaining the challenges and costs associated with upgrading existing rail lines for high-speed travel.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Tempo in Indonesian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.