DistantNews
Support us
We called Auto-Tune cheating until Cher blew us away with her mega-hit. Now history is repeating itself with AI
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Denmark /Culture & Society

We called Auto-Tune cheating until Cher blew us away with her mega-hit. Now history is repeating itself with AI

From Berlingske · () Danish

Translated from Danish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

Opinion Sources not specified Context piece
  • The article discusses the growing use of AI in music, comparing it to the controversy surrounding Auto-Tune in the 1990s.
  • It questions whether AI-generated music will achieve the same acceptance as Cher's hit "Believe," which initially faced criticism for its use of Auto-Tune.
  • The piece reflects on technological revolutions in the music industry and the current debate around AI's role.

The rise of AI artists like Sienna Rose, My Boy Arlo, and Refik Anadol is generating significant buzz and streaming numbers in the international music scene. However, the article questions the sincerity of criticism against AI music, pointing to the industry's past embrace of Auto-Tune.

In the 1990s, Cher's hit song "Believe" faced public backlash for its prominent use of Auto-Tune. Despite the initial controversy, the song became a massive success and is still widely accepted today. The current debate surrounding AI music mirrors this historical pattern, prompting the question of whether AI-generated tracks will eventually receive similar acceptance from listeners and the industry.

The piece suggests that the music industry has a history of navigating technological revolutions. The introduction of Auto-Tune in the 1990s was one such significant shift. As AI continues to advance, the industry faces another transformative period, challenging established norms and raising questions about authenticity and artistic merit.

DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Berlingske in Danish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.