What BRICS Lacks in Unity, It Makes Up for in Flexibility

The BRICS grouping, now encompassing a growing number of member states, continues to assert its presence on the global stage as a representative voice for the Global South. Recent forums, such as the one held in Beijing last month, have seen officials deliberate on expanding trade among member nations. These discussions are driven by a dual objective: to mitigate external economic shocks often linked to the US dollar and to foster a long-term vision for reforming the international financial system.

“

Such initiatives reflect both an impulse to reduce exposure to external shocks linked to the US dollar and a long-term ambition to reshape global finance.

While these gatherings serve to signal ambition, the reality of BRICS is far more complex than a monolithic bloc. The Chinese moniker 'jinzhuan' (gold brick) hints at early aspirations, yet the group's coherence is less about shared strategy and more about a collective unease with the existing global order and a desire for greater autonomy. This inherent flexibility, however, comes at the cost of unity. The recent war involving the United States, Israel, and Iran starkly illustrated this, with BRICS struggling to present a consolidated response due to the sharply differing interests and alignments among its members, including Iran and the United Arab Emirates.

“

These gatherings are as much about signalling intent as delivering substance. Brics wants to be seen as a platform through which emerging economies can reshape global engagement rules.

This lack of rigid cohesion is, paradoxically, a defining characteristic of BRICS. As the group expands, aligning diverse national interests becomes increasingly challenging. Yet, its significance lies not in offering an immediate alternative to the current world order, but in its powerful articulation of widespread dissatisfaction with it. For many member nations, the post-World War II international architecture in finance, politics, and institutions no longer adequately reflects their realities or aspirations, making BRICS a crucial platform for expressing these evolving global dynamics.

“

What binds its members is not a shared strategy or ideology, but something looser: a common unease with the global order and a desire for greater autonomy within it.