What's Behind 'Ghosting'? Why Some People Suddenly Stop Responding
Translated from Croatian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- "Ghosting," or suddenly ceasing communication without explanation, is increasingly common, especially with dating apps.
- A psychological analysis suggests this behavior often stems from self-preservation rather than cruelty, driven by an ancient brain system designed for threat response.
- While ghosting offers short-term relief from stress or perceived threat, it can cause long-term damage to relationships and lead to loneliness and guilt.
The phenomenon of "ghosting", disappearing from someone's life without explanation, is becoming increasingly prevalent, particularly with the rise of dating apps. This abrupt cessation of communication can be shocking, painful, and confusing for the person left behind.
From a survival perspective, 'ghosting' is a kind of 'trade-off.' It brings short-term relief because it reduces immediate stress or the feeling of threat, but that relief comes at the cost of long-term damage.
However, new psychological analysis suggests that the urge to ghost is often rooted in self-preservation, not malice. Clinical psychologist Charlie Heriot-Maitland explains that ghosting is triggered by an ancient brain system designed for survival, which prioritizes immediate safety over long-term relationship building. This system reacts to perceived threats, and in the moment of ghosting, the brain prioritizes avoiding anxiety, conflict, or shame over potential future consequences.
Heriot-Maitland likens ghosting to a "trade-off" from a survival perspective. It provides immediate relief by reducing stress or the feeling of threat, but this comes at the cost of long-term relational damage. The nervous system often chooses what appears safest in the present, even if it undermines relationships over time. These "controlled explosions," or self-imposed breaks, serve to prevent a larger emotional breakdown.
The nervous system in general chooses what seems safest now, even if such a choice undermines the relationship over time.
While ghosting may offer a temporary sense of security, it can paradoxically lead to loneliness, guilt, and damaged trust. Heriot-Maitland cautions against moral judgment of ghosting, whether directed at the person who ghosts or the one left behind. Instead, he suggests understanding the function the behavior serves: whether it is protective or actively damaging to relationships. The goal is not to force a change in behavior but to recognize its role.
The point of the 'break' is not to force oneself to behave differently at all costs, but to understand the role that behavior plays.
Originally published by Veฤernji List in Croatian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.