What we heard in powerful testimony from witnesses at NDIS inquiry

The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) in Australia is facing significant legislative changes proposed by the government, which aims to reduce costs by over $30 billion within four years. These amendments have sparked considerable debate and scrutiny, particularly regarding their impact on individuals with disabilities.

During six days of public hearings, senators questioned how the proposed changes would affect participants, their families, and carers, as well as the availability of alternative support services. Modeling suggests that over 300,000 participants might leave the scheme or be prevented from joining if the changes are implemented. This has created a significant divide between the government's objectives and the needs of the scheme's core users.

Despite the disagreements, there was a consensus among witnesses that measures to prevent the misuse of the system and control its growth are necessary for its long-term sustainability. The Senate committee received 4,500 submissions from concerned groups and individuals within a two-week period.

State and territory ministers expressed strong criticism, citing the rapid pace of change, insufficient consultation, and the lack of readiness of alternative services. A key contentious issue is the proposed cut to NDIS funding for community participation. The government labels this as a 'runaway' cost, planning to allow the Commonwealth disability minister to reduce funding streams by a percentage.

Specifically, funding for participants to engage in community activities, such as attending medical appointments or grocery shopping, could be cut by 50 percent. Additionally, participants' budgets for capacity-building therapies are slated for a 10 percent reduction. Disability Discrimination Commissioner Rosemary Kayess warned that reduced community engagement funding could lead to participants becoming isolated and vulnerable to violence, abuse, and exploitation, echoing concerns raised by the Disability Royal Commission.

“

They end up in either closed environments or isolated environments, and they are at risk of violence, abuse and exploitation.