DistantNews
Support us
Why some employees never say what bothers them at work. What happens before a seemingly unexpected resignation
๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Romania /Culture & Society

Why some employees never say what bothers them at work. What happens before a seemingly unexpected resignation

From Adevฤƒrul · () Romanian

Translated from Romanian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • Many employees do not voice workplace frustrations, leading to seemingly unexpected resignations.
  • Managers often focus on results, failing to build trust for open dialogue about issues.
  • Psychological safety is crucial for employees to feel comfortable expressing concerns without fear of negative consequences.

Seemingly unexpected resignations are rarely impulsive, often preceded by months of unspoken frustrations and missed conversations. Many employees remain silent about workplace problems, leaving managers blindsided when they eventually decide to leave.

There are many reasons why employees do not speak openly with their managers. Sometimes it's not even about a dysfunctional relationship. Managers are so focused on work, on results and on what they concretely have to do, that they fail to build the kind of relationship with the team that creates a feeling of openness and trust that, when I am truly concerned about a problem, I can go and discuss it with my boss.

โ€” Madi RฤƒdulescuExplaining why employees often hesitate to voice their concerns to management.

Madi Rฤƒdulescu, a Master Certified Coach, explains that employees may not speak up for various reasons, even without a dysfunctional relationship. Managers, intensely focused on tasks and results, sometimes fail to foster an environment of trust where team members feel safe discussing concerns. This lack of open dialogue can stem from employees' assumptions or genuine fears of repercussions.

Maybe sometimes it's just an assumption employees make, but the result is the same. But there are also situations where the lack of dialogue and the seemingly unexpected nature of the resignation occur because what we call psychological safety is missing.

โ€” Madi RฤƒdulescuDescribing the role of psychological safety in employee communication and resignation.

"Psychological safety is paramount," Rฤƒdulescu states. "It manifests in two key questions: 'Is it safe for me to say what I think?' and 'What are the consequences if I say what concerns me, and then what I expect doesn't happen?'" This fear can lead employees to avoid difficult conversations and lose hope for change, contributing to the surprise of their departure.

In the first place, it manifests in response to two questions: 'Is it safe for me to say what I think?' and 'What are the consequences if I say what concerns me, and then what I expect doesn't happen?'

โ€” Madi RฤƒdulescuDefining the core elements of psychological safety for employees.

Managers are often caught off guard, especially when their intentions are not to exert undue pressure or show disrespect. They may not realize how their behavior, perhaps overly focused on outcomes, creates minor disappointments or a lack of authentic connection with their staff. This disconnect prevents them from seeing the growing dissatisfaction until it culminates in a resignation.

Managers are often caught by surprise, especially when their intention is not to put undue pressure and is not due to a lack of respect or appreciation. They simply do not see how they create small disappointments or even a lack of authentic relationship with employees.

โ€” Madi RฤƒdulescuExplaining why managers are often surprised by employee resignations.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Adevฤƒrul in Romanian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.