Wolfgang Schmidbauer: Is it okay for parents to have a favorite child?
Translated from German, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Therapist Wolfgang Schmidbauer discusses the concept of parental favoritism in his series 'Familienrat'.
- He argues that the idea of a 'favorite child' is an oversimplification, likening parental love to a finite resource.
- Schmidbauer advocates for cooperation over perfection in parenting, suggesting that equal treatment is not always possible or necessary.
Therapist and analyst Wolfgang Schmidbauer challenges the common parental assertion of loving all children equally, suggesting it's an oversimplification that often doesn't hold true in practice.
In the series 'Familienrat' (Family Council), Schmidbauer advocates for a more realistic approach to parenting, emphasizing cooperation rather than the pursuit of unattainable perfection. He posits that the notion of a 'favorite child' stems from an infantile model where love is seen as a limited commodity, distributed unevenly among siblings.
Schmidbauer suggests that parents, despite their best intentions, cannot always treat each child in precisely the same way. This can lead to complex emotional dynamics within families, potentially resulting in a child later accusing their parents of favoritism.
He proposes that acknowledging these differences and focusing on fostering cooperation among family members is more beneficial than striving for an idealized, equal distribution of parental attention. This perspective encourages a more nuanced understanding of family relationships and the inherent complexities of raising children.
I find it a strong simplification to speak of a favorite child. Actually, an infantile model is behind it: Love is in a bottle, so to speak, and everyone gets some of it. The favorite children then get more than the others โ more attention, more affection.
Originally published by Die Zeit in German. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.