DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil /Technology

X Updates Algorithm After Failing to Block Candidate Profiles as Required

From Folha de S.Paulo · () Portuguese

Translated from Portuguese and summarized by DistantNews. Read the original for the full story.

At a glance

News Sources not specified Ongoing story
  • Social media platform X has updated its algorithm to comply with electoral rules requiring the exclusion of candidate profiles from content recommendation systems during election campaigns.
  • An investigation revealed that X had not equally applied this filter to all candidates, potentially leading to unequal treatment.
  • Following the investigation and questions from the press, X expanded its filter to include nearly 2,400 candidate accounts, after which no further recommendations of candidate profiles were identified.

The social media platform X has modified its algorithm to adhere to electoral regulations set by Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). These rules mandate that social networks remove candidate profiles from their content recommendation systems during election campaigns. The aim is to prevent algorithms from providing preferential treatment to certain candidates.

An analysis by the organization Sleeping Giants Brasil, along with research by Folha, indicated that X had not consistently applied this filter to all candidates who had declared their profiles to the TSE. This oversight meant that content from certain candidates could still be recommended to users who did not follow them, with the exception of paid, boosted posts.

After being questioned by the press, X updated its algorithm on Tuesday evening to include more candidate profiles in the filter. Initially, the platform's disclosed algorithm listed 665 accounts, while Folha's analysis identified over 2,107 candidate profiles declared to the TSE. This suggested at least 1,442 accounts were not being filtered. Following the report, the list of filtered accounts increased to nearly 2,400, and subsequent navigation by the reporter did not reveal further recommendations of candidate profiles.

This delay in full compliance means that candidates whose profiles were filtered later in the campaign may have been disadvantaged compared to those whose content was blocked from the outset on August 16. The platform had not responded to Folha by the time of publication regarding these findings. Additionally, some accounts appearing in the recommended tab had not been declared to the TSE or contained typographical errors.

About this summary

Originally published by Folha de S.Paulo in Portuguese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized automatically by DistantNews, with a note on how the source frames the story. Not individually reviewed before publishing. How this works.