Zagreb defends underground waste bins in city center, citing European norms
Translated from Croatian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Administrators defended the placement of underground waste containers in Zagreb's central Ban Jelačić Square, explaining they are a common European utility.
- They argued that the location was chosen after years of searching due to dense underground infrastructure and the need to serve residents and businesses.
- The move aims to create a cleaner public space by replacing traditional containers with a unified system, despite public outcry over the aesthetic impact.
Administrators have defended the installation of underground waste containers in Zagreb's central Ban Jelačić Square, countering criticism that the move is an "unusual Zagreb innovation" that will harm the city's European character. They pointed out that similar underground systems are standard in many European cities, including Ljubljana, Amsterdam, and Paris, where they have replaced thousands of conventional containers.
In reality, underground containers are a completely normal part of the municipal infrastructure in numerous European cities.
The decision to place the containers at the junction of Ban Jelačić Square and Ilica was made after years of deliberation. The area, despite its central location, is home to residents, shops, restaurants, and offices, all of which generate waste. Finding a suitable location proved challenging due to the extensive network of underground utilities, water, sewage, gas, electricity, telecommunications, and tram infrastructure, occupying nearly every meter beneath the surface. The chosen spot was identified as the only viable option for installing the new system.
The location for the area around the Ilica skyscraper has been sought for years.
Without this solution, the city would have been forced to maintain two separate waste management systems: one for underground containers and another for the few remaining traditional bins near the Ilica skyscraper. This would have required different types of trucks for various waste streams (mixed, paper, plastic, bio-waste) and increased logistical complexity. The new unified system, administrators argue, will mean fewer trucks, fewer disruptions, and cleaner sidewalks, contributing to a more orderly public space.
Without that location, ordinary bins and containers would have remained there. That would also mean that Čistoća (the waste management company) would have to maintain two parallel systems in the center.
Despite these explanations, the installation sparked public debate, with headlines questioning the location and its aesthetic impact. Administrators lamented that public reaction often precedes informed understanding, urging citizens to seek basic information about the necessity, alternatives considered, and the technical challenges before forming an opinion. They emphasized that the goal is a more efficient and tidier urban environment, integrating modern waste management solutions common across Europe.
And then the drama began. We read headlines like: 'Zagreb residents shocked by the location of underground containers in the heart of the city,' 'An insult or better waste disposal?', 'When you think it can't get any worse' and, of course, the unavoidable question: 'What do you think about it?'
Originally published by Večernji List in Croatian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.