Zurich's Expensive Reputation: A Ranking of Rankings
Translated from German, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Zurich frequently ranks high in international city rankings for livability and wealth.
- The article questions the methodology and value of these rankings, calling them absurd and often nonsensical.
- A new 'ranking of rankings' is proposed, focusing on entertainment value, with Zurich appearing in a 'rich ranking' as the second most expensive city for the wealthy.
Zurich consistently tops international city rankings, lauded for its livability, wealth, and innovation. However, the article questions the validity and methodology behind these numerous global assessments, deeming them increasingly absurd and often filled with nonsense.
The piece suggests that these rankings, compiled by international consulting groups, companies, and media outlets, treat complex urban environments like livestock at an auction. While they generate significant attention and serve as free advertising for their creators, their statistical rigor is often questionable.
As a counterpoint to the "ranking craze," the article proposes its own 'ranking of rankings,' prioritizing entertainment value. In this context, Zurich appears in a 'rich ranking' compiled by Bank Julius Baer. The report, which assesses the cost of twenty luxury goods and services, identifies Zurich as the second most expensive city globally for the wealthy, trailing only Singapore.
The report attributes Zurich's high ranking primarily to the strength of the Swiss franc. It posits that the most expensive cities are "ecosystems where strong institutions support strong currencies, thereby enabling capital preservation combined with quality of life." The article implies that such explanations, while offered by the bank, may not fully satisfy the complexities of urban life or the purpose of these rankings.
Originally published by Neue Zรผrcher Zeitung in German. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.