Abolition of AUKU aligns with KPT's higher education reform plans

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's announcement to abolish the Universities and University Colleges Act 1971 (AUKU) marks a significant development in Malaysia's higher education reform journey. Ibrahim stated the government would repeal the act after considering student demands.

“

Today they are growing up in a world where many people believe they know someone's life by just seeing a photograph, a video, or a headline. A world where they judge before asking, point before knowing, and criticize before understanding.

Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM), as a public university, expressed appreciation for the Prime Minister's commitment, viewing it within the framework of broader higher education transformation. The statement from the Minister of Higher Education, Datuk Seri Diraja Dr. Zambry Abdul Kadir, provided further context, explaining that the Ministry of Higher Education (KPT) had already factored in the need to renew the country's higher education legal framework through the Malaysia Higher Education Blueprint (RPTM) 2026–2035, launched on January 20, 2026.

This indicates that efforts to reform AUKU were not solely a recent response to student pressure but were part of KPT's strategic planning. The blueprint includes the agenda for establishing the One Higher Education Act (OHEA), a more comprehensive piece of legislation. While AUKU is often discussed in terms of student freedom, such as freedom of association, political activities, and speech, its scope extends far beyond student affairs.

“

I can't stop that from existing. What I can do is teach them to never let others' opinions define who they are or how far they can go. I want them to always feel free.

AUKU serves as a primary legal framework for the establishment, operation, administration, and governance of public universities. It addresses university structures, authorities, administrative mechanisms, and various other aspects. Therefore, abolishing AUKU is not simply a matter of removing a disciplinary regulation; it requires establishing a new, comprehensive legal framework to ensure no legislative vacuum or governance uncertainty arises in higher education institutions.

“

No one has the power to define who you are, except yourselves and God. Let your actions speak louder than any lie, let your peace be worth more than any judgment. I love you too much.

The RPTM 2026–2035 provides a clear direction for this change, viewing higher education reform holistically rather than solely from a student perspective. The plan aims to create a more progressive and suitable legal environment for the current needs of higher education.

“

As is evident, this decision is political, rather political and propagandistic, Hitler-style, as there is no reason to justify such an arrogant procedure.