After Skvernelis's statements – the presidency: it's a defensive strategy

Former Lithuanian Prime Minister Saulius Skvernelis has broken his silence following suspicions in a case involving the Plant Production Inspection, asserting that a "vendetta" is being pursued against him and hinting at a potential presidential bid.

“

Maybe someone would like to send me to the other side in various ways and means, but I will fight on.

Skvernelis, who previously spoke of political "death," now feels compelled to act, believing he is the target of a concerted effort. He stated in an interview with Delfi that he is "not afraid of anything anymore" and intends to "fight back." He plans to reveal his new political plans to the public in early autumn.

The politician explicitly suggested that not only special services but also President Gitanas Nausėda might be involved in this alleged campaign against him. Skvernelis intends to present factual evidence regarding these claims at the appropriate time. While he avoids labeling the case as purely political, he acknowledges its significant political dimensions.

“

I will have to put this matter on the table with facts, various decrees – and I will do so when the moment comes.

Skvernelis revealed that a complaint is being prepared for the European Court of Human Rights. He pointed to President Nausėda's public statements following the searches as an example of undue pressure. Specifically, he criticized the president's initial comments suggesting no reason to doubt the institutions' actions and his later remark about receiving operational information, which Skvernelis deems impossible for a head of state.

“

The country's leader does not have the opportunity – neither to know nor to claim. His main mission is to ensure the protection of constitutional rights and freedoms.

"Any politician, especially at the highest level, must choose their words carefully when commenting on a pre-trial investigation," Skvernelis stated, referencing past instances where Lithuania faced compensation claims at the European Court of Human Rights due to concerns about impartial investigations. The President's office declined to comment further on Skvernelis's remarks, describing them as a "defensive strategy."

“

To bring charges against any person, one needs not courage and citizenship, but evidence.