Are There No 'Professional' Prosecutors? [Park Yong-hyun Column]
Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
TLDR
- A South Korean prosecutor, Park Sang-yong, refused to take an oath during a parliamentary hearing on alleged political prosecution, leading to his removal.
- The hearing revealed accusations of illegal plea bargaining and fabricating investigation records against prosecutors.
- The article criticizes the perceived lack of professionalism and adherence to ethical standards within the prosecution service, citing international guidelines.
The recent parliamentary hearing into alleged political prosecution has brought to light deeply troubling accusations against South Korea's prosecutors, particularly concerning the investigation into the alleged North Korean currency remittance case. Prosecutor Park Sang-yong's refusal to take an oath, a move seen as an admission of guilt by many, underscores the gravity of the allegations.
Can a prosecutor say this?
Further revelations, including an alleged conversation where Park offered leniency in exchange for specific testimony to a former vice governor, have shaken public trust. Even former superiors have acknowledged the impropriety of such actions, suggesting a systemic issue rather than isolated incidents. Accounts of fabricated investigation records and intrusive personal questioning have added to the growing chorus of criticism.
I don't think it's okay.
This column, from Hankyoreh, argues that these actions deviate starkly from the professional conduct expected of prosecutors, as outlined by international bodies like the International Association of Prosecutors (IAP). The IAP's standards emphasize maintaining the honor and dignity of the profession, acting professionally, and upholding objectivity and human rights. The alleged behaviorโpleading with lawyers, pressuring witnesses, and offering dealsโstands in direct opposition to these principles.
Prosecutors must always maintain the honor and dignity of the profession.
The article contends that the problem extends beyond a few "political prosecutors" and has become ingrained in the organizational culture. The lack of internal accountability and the tendency to defend rather than introspect are seen as dangerous signs. To restore the integrity of the prosecution service, the author suggests a radical reform: stripping prosecutors of their investigative powers and redefining their role as overseers of objective prosecution, with clear legal mandates for their duties. This, it is argued, is the only way to salvage the honor of the profession and ensure justice is served impartially.
Prosecutors must always act professionally in accordance with the law and professional ethics.
Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.