DistantNews
Belgrade's New Ramps: Traffic Safety or Budget Drain?

Belgrade's New Ramps: Traffic Safety or Budget Drain?

From N1 Serbia · (6h ago) Serbian Critical tone

Translated from Serbian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

TLDR

  • Belgrade authorities have installed new ramps in the city center, restricting access to public transport vehicles only.
  • Nataša Pantić of Zbor Stari grad criticizes the move as an experiment and a potential method for budget corruption, questioning its effectiveness for traffic safety.
  • Pantić also described the overall state of Belgrade's public transport as a catastrophe, citing issues with bus colors, privatization, and dynamic timetables.

The recent installation of new ramps in Belgrade's city center, ostensibly for traffic safety and public transport access, has drawn sharp criticism from local civic groups. Nataša Pantić of Zbor Stari grad views these ramps not as a solution but as another in a series of "experiments" by the city authorities, who she argues fail to conduct proper studies before implementing changes.

rampe predstavljaju "još jedan u nizu eksperimenata gradskih vlasti"

— Nataša PantićNataša Pantić from Zbor Stari grad criticizes the newly installed ramps in Belgrade's city center.

Her critique extends beyond the ramps themselves, questioning the very purpose and effectiveness of such measures. Pantić highlights that despite existing parking violations and a visible presence of municipal police, no consistent enforcement has occurred. This lack of action, she suggests, fuels suspicion that the ramps are merely a pretext for siphoning funds from the city budget, a concern that resonates with a public accustomed to questioning official projects.

Gradske vlasti umesto da urade studiju ili procenu šta Beogradu treba, i onda sprovedu neku promenu, zapravo rade sve eksperimentalno, pa tako i sa saobraćajem

— Nataša PantićPantić elaborates on her view that city authorities are experimenting with changes rather than conducting proper assessments.

Furthermore, Pantić paints a grim picture of Belgrade's public transportation system, labeling it a "catastrophe." She points to seemingly arbitrary decisions, such as repainting buses, and the privatization of routes, as evidence of a dysfunctional system. The introduction of dynamic timetables, she argues, has done little to improve the situation. The overarching sentiment is that the city administration is engaged in superficial actions, creating an illusion of progress rather than addressing fundamental issues.

S druge strane, ovde se ljudi godinama parkiraju, iako to nije dozvoljeno. I do sada ništa nije urađeno kako bi se to sprečilo, poput naplaćivanja kazni. Mi ovde imamo mnogo komunalnih policajaca koji ništa ne rade, nije najjasnije njihova uloga i samo postoje. Samim tim, ne možemo a da ne posumnjamo da je ova rampa samo još jedan način isisavanja novca iz budžeta grada, odnosno korupcija, kao što smo i navikli

— Nataša PantićPantić questions the necessity of the ramps given the lack of enforcement against illegal parking and the perceived ineffectiveness of municipal police, suggesting corruption as a motive.

From a local perspective in Belgrade, these developments are not just about traffic flow or public transport efficiency. They reflect a deeper frustration with governance, a perceived lack of transparency, and a pattern of questionable decision-making. The N1 Serbia report captures this local sentiment, where skepticism towards official initiatives is high, and citizens are quick to scrutinize actions that appear to lack clear justification or benefit.

sve što se dešava sa gradskim prevozom u Beogradu je "jedna velika katostrofa"

— Nataša PantićPantić describes the state of public transport in Belgrade.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by N1 Serbia in Serbian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.